Psilometriocnemus triannulatus Saether
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Psilometriocnemus triannulatus Saether Figs 34A–F Diagnosis. SI seta apically dissected; pectin epipharyngis with three peg-like scales; premandible with two teeth; antenna 6 segmented, the last one hair-like barely visible, segment 3 is 0.25x as long as segment 4, blade about as long as flagellum, 5 segmented; AR 0.9 (see Notes); mandible with there inner teeth; mentum with broad bifid median tooth, 5 lateral teeth, last outer two reduced and share a common base; VM plate distinct, originating from the outer margin of first lateral and ending with a posterordorsal extension; setae submenti placed at a level posterior to the plates; procercus with 3 strong apical setae with bulbous bases and 6 fine setae that appear to be arising more laterally; anal tubules elongate about same length as posterior parapods; supraanal seta with basal spinules. Notes. Generally in agreement with description of larva given by Saether (1982: 486) as Psilometriocnemus cristatus Saether. The AR is determined from a 5-segmented antenna. Ecology and habitat. Species inhabit springs and cool headwater streams (Ferrington et al. 1995). Sampling sites. We found the larvae inhabiting streams in all the provincial parks and districts located in our study area. Nearctic distribution. Canada: New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, Ontario, Québec. USA: Florida, Georgia, Kansas, Minnesota, New Hampshire, Ohio, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".