Bibliographic record
Abstract
acuticornis (Wulp), 1897: 358, pl. 9, fig. 13 (head) ST: Published as “Several male specimens, Mexico, Northern Sonora (Morrison).” NHMUK, unnumbered LT: ♂ (Fisher & Orth 1972b). NHMUK Paralectotypes: 4♂ 3♀ (Fisher & Orth 1972b). NHMUK Homeotypes: Many, referred to by Fisher & Orth (1972b) as “other specimens at hand which fit our concept of H. acuticornis.” [Their detailed listing (not including number of males/females) does not specify whether all or only some specimens are homeotypes. The list includes specimens collected 9.I–22.XII in Canada (British Columbia) and in the United States (California, Illinois, Kansas, Nebraska, Nevada, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Oregon, Texas, Utah, and Washington), deposited in ANSP, CUIC, KSBS, MCZC, TAMU, UCRC, and USNM.] Note: Wulp (1897) described H. acuticornis from specimens labeled “ N Sonora, Mexico, Morrison,” but subsequent studies show that they probably were collected in Arizona, U.S.A. (Selander & Vaurie 1962; Fisher & Orth 1972b). Specimens have since been collected in localities both north and south of Sonora, so H. acuticornis almost certainly occurs in Sonora. DIST: GUATEMALA (Alta Verapaz: Cobán). MEXICO (Guanajuato: Salvatierra; Veracruz). Also CANADA (British Columbia) and UNITED STATES (Arizona, California, Florida, Minnesota, New Mexico, Texas, Utah, Washington). Map: Fisher & Orth 1972b FIGS: Fisher & Orth 1972b (habitus, head, ♂ terminalia, ♂ genitalia; ♀ sternites) BIOL: Fisher & Orth 1972b (includes extensive information on flight period and macrohabitats of adults) IMMATS: Unknown HOSTS/PREY OF LARVAE: Probably Succinea species, according to Fisher & Orth 1972b MOL_DAT: Y
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.025 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".