MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6949775538 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.14895278

Clinocera courtneyi Sinclair & Plant, 2022, sp. nov.

2022· article· en· W6949775538 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicMollusks and Parasites Studies
Canadian institutionsCanadian Food Inspection Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSetaDorsumApex (geometry)FemurRidge

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Clinocera courtneyi sp. nov. (Figs 3, 7, 23) urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: 99A82DEA-2227-4FF5-9DC6-BA94CABFD60D Type material. HOLOTYPE, ♂ labelled: “ THAILAND: Chiang Mai Prov / Doi Inthanon NP, Namtok / Mae Pan, 1100 m, 18°31′N / 98°27′E, 23.v.2004 / madicolous, G.W. Courtney ”; “HOLOTYPE/ Clinocera / courtneyi/ Sinclair & Plant [red label]” (CNC). Recognition. This species is distinguished from the other Thailand species of Clinocera by the broad face with shiny ventrolateral pruinescent patches, narrow surstylus and paired oval membranous swellings at the apex of the phallic shaft. Description (wing length 2.7 mm). Male. Head: Oval, mostly brown. Face broad, brown, wider than antennal sockets, without lateral setulae; silvery pruinescence patch on ventrolateral corner (at certain angles) (Fig. 3). Ocellar triangle with pair of divergent ocellar setae; pair of strong vertical setae. Antenna brown; arista-like stylus slightly longer than remaining antenna. Thorax: Scutum brown, dull, without vittae; postpronotal lobes and post alar ridge orange brown; notopleuron with silvery pruinescence at certain angles. Pleura brown with thin silvery pruinescence. Several very minute acrostichals anterior to first dc; 5 dc; 1 pprn, thin and reduced; 1 presut spal; 1 strong upper npl, lower npl slender, less than half length of upper seta; 1 posterior psut spal; 1 pal; 2 sctl, similar to prescutellar dc. Laterotergite with several brownish setae. Legs: Coxae and ventral faces of mid and hind femora yellowish brown, remaining segments brown. Fore femur with anteroventral and posteroventral rows of strong setae, length one-third width of femur. Hind tibia with strong dorsal and ventral setae on distal half, length nearly subequal to width of tibia. Wing: Narrow; infuscate; pterostigma absent; single long basal costal seta present; cell dm produced distally. Halter pale brown. Abdomen: Sclerites brown, with thin pruinescence, similar shade to thorax. Terminalia (Fig. 7): Hypandrium narrow, longer than width of epandrium, slightly tapered distally, without lateral setae. Phallus sinuous with paired, rounded membranous sacs at apex of shaft; distiphallus slender, arched apically, less than one-half length of shaft. Ejaculatory apodeme slender. Epandrium oval, with short setae. Clasping cercus digitiform, broad; inner face with peg-like setae over most of surface, posterior margin with longer, thickened setae. Surstylus narrow, strongly tapered, arched, with several stout, lateral setulae; dorsal margin with narrow peak. Female. Unknown. Etymology. The species is named in honour of Greg Courtney, who collected the holotype and is a specialist on aquatic Diptera. Greg has kindly provided many very interesting and rare clinocerines. Distribution and Ecology. This species is known only from the holotype and is apparently endemic to the mountain Doi Inthanon, in northern Thailand (Fig. 23). The type locality was a waterfall (“ namtok ”) at 1,100 m and the species was recorded as being madicolous. Remarks. This species is assigned to the C. nigra group, similar to C. nigra Meigen on the basis the broad face, lateral facial pruinescent patches, reduced postpronotal seta and shape of the phallus (Sinclair 2007, 2008). This species group also includes the following Oriental species: C. lunata Wagner & Leese, C. lunatoides Wagner & Leese, C. pani Smith, C. setosa Wagner & Leese and C. sinclairi Wagner & Leese.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.055
Threshold uncertainty score0.109

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.012

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicMollusks and Parasites StudiesFrench-language works237,207