Sepedon praemiosa Giglio-Tos 1893
Bibliographic record
Abstract
praemiosa Giglio-Tos, 1893: 8 HT: ♂ Mexico, Morelia. MIZT, Box No. 28, unnumbered [no record of subsequent holotype examination] TOPOTYPES: 1♂ 2♀ Mexico, Michoacán, 8 mi e. Morelia, 1.V.1953, R.C. Bechtel & E.I. Schlinger (1♂ EMEC, 1♂ 1♀ USNM) [Fisher & Orth 1972a: 11] DIST: MEXICO (Central highlands south to Oaxaca. Durango: Durango; Jalisco; Michoacán; Oaxaca: Oaxaca; Puebla: Cholula). Also UNITED STATES (Idaho, Montana, Oregon, Utah, Washington). Map: Neff & Berg 1966 (in part); Fisher & Orth 1972a FIGS: Steyskal 1951 (♂ terminalia, ♂ hind femur and tibia), Fisher & Orth 1972a (♂ terminalia, ♂ genitalia), this paper (dorsal head, mid and hind femora) BIOL: Neff & Berg (1966) described the biology of “ Sepedon praemiosa ” from laboratory rearings initiated with individuals from Oaxaca, Mexico; Cypress Lake, Saskatchewan, Canada; and Riverside, California. Fisher & Orth (1972a), in their resurrection of Sepedon pacifica from synonymy, redescription of S. praemiosa, and analysis of distribution records and specimens, considered that the rearings initiated with individuals from Mexico were S. praemiosa and that those from Cypress Lake and Riverside were S. pacifica. They noted that Neff & Berg (1966) did not indicate any biological or morphological differences between immatures from the three localities. BG 11; PG 2 HOSTS/PREY OF LARVAE: Biomphalaria glabrata, Helisoma trivolvis, and Physa sp. IMMATS: Neff & Berg 1966 (E, L1–L3, P, but not known whether from S. pacifica or S. praemiosa). Neff & Berg (1966) described all immature stages of “ Sepedon praemiosa ” from specimens from laboratory rearings initiated with individuals from Oaxaca, Mexico and Cypress Lake, Canada. As noted above, Fisher & Orth (1972a) considered the Mexican material to be S. praemiosa and the Canadian material to be S. pacifica. MOL_DAT: Y Note: Steyskal (1951) placed S. pacifica in synonymy with S. praemiosa Giglio-Tos. Fisher & Orth (1972a) removed S. pacifica from that synonymy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.082 | 0.045 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".