Hippasteria phrygiana Parelius 1768
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Hippasteria phrygiana (Parelius 1768) Mah et al. 2014: 441 (as H. phrygiana) covers complete synonymy. Comments. Foltz et al. (2013) and Mah et al. (2014) have extensively examined the global phylogeography of this species and concluded that several Pacific Hippasteria species, including Hippasteria spinosa, which have been studied at SCUBA depths in the Northwest Pacific (e.g., Birkeland et a. 1974; Mauzey et al. 1968) were synonyms. Although Hippasteria phyrgiana has not been recorded from below 1000 m in the Pacific Northwest, it has apparently been collected from deeper depths elsewhere (e.g, Maluf 1987). Thus, it is possible that H. phrygiana could occur at deeper depths from the region covered herein. Alternatively it is also possible that there is morphological convergence as there was some morphological similarity between H. phrygiana and specimens of H. californica and H. tiburoni, all different species but showing very similar diagnostic features. Occurrence. (data taken from Mah et al., 2014) North Pacific: Japan, Aleutian Islands, Alaska, west coast of North America, including Canada, Washington, Oregon, west to President Jackson Seamount, south to Southern California. South Pacific: New Zealand, Solomon Islands, Straits of Magellan-Chile. South Indian: Kerguelen Islands, Crozet, Marion and Bouvet Isles, South Africa. Atlantic: East coast of North America, south to Cape Cod. Northeastern Atlantic-North Sea, Kattegat, northern Scotland and northernmost Ireland, the UK. South Atlantic-off Argentina, west side of South Africa, Lambert’s Bay to Cape Point. 10–1405 m (but varies by location).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".