Aconitum napellus Linnaeus 1753
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Aconitum napellus Linnaeus, Species Plantarum 1: 532. 1753. "Habitat in Helvetia, Bavaria, Gallia." RCN: 3954. Lectotype (Seitz in Feddes Repert. 80: 24, t. 1. 1969): Herb. Clifford: 214, Aconitum 3, sheet A (BM-000628795). Generitype of Aconitum Linnaeus. Current name: Aconitum napellus L. (Ranunculaceae). Note: Aconitum napellus, with the type designated by Seitz (but in the proposal erroneously attributed to Molero & Blanché in Anales Jard. Bot. Madrid 41: 212. 1984), was proposed as conserved type of the genus by Jarvis (in Taxon 41: 555. 1992). However, the proposal was eventually ruled unnecessary by the General Committee (see Barrie, l.c. 55: 795-796. 2006 for a review of the history of this and related proposals). Seitz’s choice of the Clifford sheet as type was rejected by Skalický (in Preslia 54: 117. 1982), on the grounds of geographical conflict with the protologue, and a neotype chosen. Despite being followed by Starmühler (in Wisskirchen & Haeupler, Standardliste Farn-Blütenpfl. Deutschl. : 41. 1998), this is in any case invalid because original elements are in existence.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".