Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<b>Aconitum napellus</b> Linnaeus, <i>Species Plantarum</i> 1: 532. 1753. "Habitat in Helvetia, Bavaria, Gallia." RCN: 3954. Lectotype (Seitz in <i>Feddes Repert.</i> 80: 24, t. 1. 1969): Herb. Clifford: 214, <i>Aconitum</i> 3, sheet A (BM-000628795). Generitype of <i>Aconitum</i> Linnaeus. Current name: <b> <i>Aconitum napellus</i></b> L. (Ranunculaceae). <i>Note: Aconitum napellus</i>, with the type designated by Seitz (but in the proposal erroneously attributed to Molero & Blanché in <i>Anales Jard. Bot. Madrid</i> 41: 212. 1984), was proposed as conserved type of the genus by Jarvis (in <i>Taxon</i> 41: 555. 1992). However, the proposal was eventually ruled unnecessary by the General Committee (see Barrie, <i>l.c.</i> 55: 795-796. 2006 for a review of the history of this and related proposals). Seitz’s choice of the Clifford sheet as type was rejected by Skalický (in <i>Preslia</i> 54: 117. 1982), on the grounds of geographical conflict with the protologue, and a neotype chosen. Despite being followed by Starmühler (in Wisskirchen & Haeupler, <i>Standardliste Farn-Blütenpfl. Deutschl.</i> : 41. 1998), this is in any case invalid because original elements are in existence.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.048 | 0.030 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it