Pectinaster filholi Perrier 1885
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pectinaster filholi Perrier, 1885c Reports for the Azores: Pectinaster filholi Perrier, 1885 c— $ Perrier 1894: 280–285, pl. 18, figs. 2a–b, pl. 20, figs. 3a–d; Mortensen 1927a: 71; Cherbonnier & Sibuet 1972: 378; A.M. Clark 1981: 118–121; Gage et al. 1983: 277; $ A.M. Clark & Downey 1992: 139–140, figs. 21b, 22l–m, pl. 34, figs. A–C; Dilman 2006: 184, 2008: 139, 2013: 569, 2014: 31. Type locality: off Cap Blanc. See: A.M. Clark (1981); A.M. Clark & Downey (1992). Occurrence: Atlantic; in the west from south of Nova Scotia to Delaware (Sladen 1889); in the east from the Rockall Trough (Gage et al. 1983) southwards to South Africa (Clark 1981) and on the Mid-Atlantic Ridge, from the Reykjanes Ridge (South of Iceland; Dilman 2006) south to the Charlie-Gibbs Fracture Zone (Dilman 2008) and the Azores (Perrier 1894); also reported off the River Plate, South America (Sladen 1889). Depth: 1,258 –4,850 m (AZO: 1,258 m; Sladen 1889, Perrier 1894). Habitat: soft sediment, mud or Globigerina ooze (Sladen 1889, Gage et al. 1983). Larval stage: lecithotrophic (McEdward & Miner 2001). Remarks: Perrier (1885c, 1894) described the deep-sea asteroid Pectinaster filholi based on the material collected by Talisman, which included the only known specimen from Azorean waters (sta 126, 1883: 38°37’N, 28°20’46”W, 1,258 m), the same specimen re-examined later by A.M. Clark & Downey (1992).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.021 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".