Bibliographic record
Abstract
Genus PSEUDOMELINA Malloch, 1933 One species, South America only PSEUDOMELINA Malloch, 1933: 307 Type-species: Pseudomelina apicalis Malloch, 1933 (monotypic and original designation) Note: Placement in Sciomyzini is questionable. Marinoni & Mathis (2000) did not address the issue, although they addressed placement of other genera. The original description by Malloch (1933) states, “Agrees in many characters with Melina [= Eutrichomelina] albibasi s, but lacks the propleural [proepisternal] bristle,” a diagnostic character of all species of Sciomyzini except Atrichomelina pubera, in which the propleural seta is greatly reduced. Knutson (1977: 597) compared 5♀ from Aysén, Linares, and Valdivia (CNC, USNM) with the holotype and noted, “The propleural bristle [of the holotype] is absent on either side, and there do not appear to be sockets where these bristles may have been present. Five females from the Canadian National Collection (CNC) compare exactly with the holotype and the description except that the CNC specimens each have a well-developed propleural bristle on each side. The species was adequately described by Malloch (1933). However, in the specimens from the CNC the number of pre-apical anterodorsal bristles on the hind femur, stated as two by Malloch, range from one to three.”
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.027 | 0.040 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".