Bibliographic record
Abstract
Genus PSEUDOMELINA Malloch, 1933 One species, South America only PSEUDOMELINA Malloch, 1933: 307 Type-species: Pseudomelina apicalis Malloch, 1933 (monotypic and original designation) Note: Placement in Sciomyzini is questionable. Marinoni & Mathis (2000) did not address the issue, although they addressed placement of other genera. The original description by Malloch (1933) states, “Agrees in many characters with Melina [= Eutrichomelina] albibasi s, but lacks the propleural [proepisternal] bristle,” a diagnostic character of all species of Sciomyzini except Atrichomelina pubera, in which the propleural seta is greatly reduced. Knutson (1977: 597) compared 5♀ from Aysén, Linares, and Valdivia (CNC, USNM) with the holotype and noted, “The propleural bristle [of the holotype] is absent on either side, and there do not appear to be sockets where these bristles may have been present. Five females from the Canadian National Collection (CNC) compare exactly with the holotype and the description except that the CNC specimens each have a well-developed propleural bristle on each side. The species was adequately described by Malloch (1933). However, in the specimens from the CNC the number of pre-apical anterodorsal bristles on the hind femur, stated as two by Malloch, range from one to three.”
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".