Bibliographic record
Abstract
Catops basilaris Say, 1823 LABRADOR: Grand Lake Rd, km 39.7, 24.VII.1992, K. Perrault, (1, CFNL). NEWFOUNDLAND: Eight hundred and thirty specimens were examined. The earliest record is from 1977 (Windsor Lake, 30.VIII.1977, D.J. Larson, (1, MUN)). NOVA SCOTIA: One hundred and eighty-three specimens were examined from Annapolis, Antigonish, Colchester, Cumberland, Guysborough, Halifax, Inverness, Lunenburg, Pictou, Queens, Shelburne, Victoria, and Yarmouth counties. The earliest record is from 1965 (Lunenburg Co.: Bridgewater, 1-16.VII.1965, B. Wright, red oak forest, pitfall trap, (1, NSMC)). Catops basilaris was reported by Peck and Cook (2002) from Labrador, Newfoundland, New Brunswick, and Nova Scotia including Cape Breton Island (Fig. 11). It is the most widespread and frequently collected species of Catops in North America, primarily collected in forested environments at carrion, but also occasionally on decaying mushrooms, in forest litter, in mammal and wasp nests, and on owl pellets. It is found in deciduous, mixed, and coniferous forests and Sphagnum bog habitats (Peck and Cook 2002). In Nova Scotia, specimens have been collected in coniferous, deciduous, mixed, and coastal forests.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.018 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".