MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6949949944 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.5626559

Dioctophyme Collet-Meygret 1802

2016· article· en· W6949949944 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicPaleopathology and ancient diseases
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLepomisPrimordiumDigeneaVaginaVulvaAdult maleSex organ

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

* Dioctophyme Collet-Meygret, 1802 Generic diagnosis (after Mace & Anderson 1975, and Measures & Anderson 1985). Dioctophymatidae. Encapsulated L3 occur most commonly in hypaxial musculature of fishes, some in body cavity. Two circles of labial papillae surround mouth. Inner circle comprises six single papillae. Outer circle comprises four single and two double papillae. Amphids situated laterally between the interno- and externo-lateral papillae (Fig. 15 A). Three large cells (one dorsal, two subventral) surround narrow buccal capsule and anterior end of oesophagus (Fig. 15 B). Average length of oesophagus about 40% of total body length. A large circular muscle constitutes the oesophagointestinal sphincter (Fig. 15 C). For length and width of male L3 from pumpkinseed Lepomis gibbosus see key above. Genital primordium diorchic and opisthorchic. For length and width of female L3 from pumpkinseed see key above. Vagina evident; non-patent vulva near oesophago-intestinal valve. Genital primordium monodelphic and opisthodelphic. Anus terminal in both sexes. Cuticles of 1st and 2nd moults retained. One species, * D. renale, has been found as L 3 in Canadian fresh-water fishes. Adult D. renale occur in the kidneys of piscivorous mammals, especially mustelids and wild canids.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.051

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicPaleopathology and ancient diseasesFrench-language works237,207