MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6949953605 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.5187848

Heterocerus mollinus Kiesenwetter 1851

2012· article· en· W6949953605 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSubterranean biodiversity and taxonomy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDorsumBasal (medicine)GenusAppendageBilateral symmetry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

9. Heterocerus mollinus Kiesenwetter (Fig. 20, 41, 62) Heterocerus mollinus Kiesenwetter 1851: 289. Lanternarius mollinus (Kiesenwetter): Pacheco 1964: 66. Description. Length 4.0 - 5.5 mm. Dark red to dark brown. Apical angles of pronotum usually pale. Pale elytral markings distinct and often trifaciate with two basal, one median, and two apical light marks (Fig. 20); markings variable, in extreme cases basal and medial elytral markings lacking; striae vaguely indicated. Post-metathoracic coxal lines absent, post-mesothoracic coxal lines prominent. Male genitalia (Fig. 41) of the typical Heterocerus type, phallobase gradually narrowed anteriorly to approximately 75% of its greatest width; median plate, in anterior half, linear and positioned on left side of the midline of the phallobase; parameres triangular with rounded apices, their medial edges only slightly divergent anteriorly and separated by about half the width of one paramere; dorsal plate nearly circular, with a small sclerotized cleft on its left anterior edge. Perhaps half of all male specimens are indistinguishable from females externally, but the remainder show some degree of mandibular enlargement, with about 10% being truly hypermandibulate. Diagnosis. This species is similar in general appearance to two other southeastern species that have post-mesothoracic coxal lines, H. sinuosus and H. insolens. Similar coloration of the pronotum and elytra distinguishes H. mollinus from H. sinuosus, in which the pronotum is lighter than the elytra (Fig. 19). Heterocerus mollinus is very similar to H. insolens and is most easily distinguished by examination of the male genitalia. The gradually narrowed phallobase of H. mollinus immediately distinguishes it from H. insolens, in which there is a more abrupt constriction (Fig. 42). Generally, specimens of H. insolens often can be distinguished from H. mollinus by the elytral pattern. The median and distal pale markings are less extensive in H. mollinus (compare Figures 18 and 20). Notes. This is the most common species of Heterocerus in the eastern United States. Thousands of specimens can be collected in light traps placed near muddy river banks. During this study, much of the labor required during the processing of light trap samples involved distinguishing other species of heterocerids from the huge numbers of H. mollinus present. Miller (1988b) coined the term king males for male specimens of H. mollinus that have a dorsal horn protruding from the surface of the mandibles, as well as being hypermandibulate to an exaggerated extent. No king males were found among the thousands of specimens examined during this study. Heterocerus mollinus has been collected from a wide range of habitats throughout Mississippi. This, and Tropicus pusillus, are the only heterocerids in the study area that are often collected from nonriverine environments, such as roadside ditches. It is common near rivers and ponds of all sizes. Distribution. Heterocerus mollinus occurs throughout North America, except northern Canada. It occurs throughout the study area (Fig. 62), but appears to be less common near the Atlantic Coast and in Florida. Specimens examined from five localities in Georgia and two in Florida represent new state records (See Appendix). Specimens examined. 1,931, not including approximately 19,900 collected 26 May 2005, Jefferson County Mississippi, Flathead Lake, N 31 o 50.706', W -91 o 12.899'. (See Appendix).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.541
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1100.051

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.133 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicSubterranean biodiversity and taxonomyFrench-language works237,207