Allocapnia illinoensis Frison 1935
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Allocapnia illinoensis Frison. Frison (1935) described this species from a disjunct population in Clark County in southeastern Illinois. Otherwise, the bulk of its distribution occurs in the upper Great Lakes region, eastern Canada, and from scattered locations in the Appalachian Mountains (Ross & Ricker 1971, DeWalt et al. 2010). Despite numerous attempts to recollect the species from and near the type locality, no new specimens have been found. Consequently, Webb (2002) and DeWalt et al. (2005) have listed it as extirpated from Illinois. Grubbs (2004) stated that although Finni (1973), Bednarik & McCafferty (1977), and Stewart & Stark (2002) each listed A. illinoensis from Indiana, no specific literature records or museum specimens had been found. We present one population from northeastern Indiana and a second from central Indiana ca. 90 km northeast of the type locality. IN, Putnam Co., Tributary Big Walnut Creek, Hall Woods Nature Preserve, 4 km E Bainbridge, 39.7608, -86.7837, 4/20/2008, R.E. DeWalt, S.K. Ferguson, ♀ (INHS); Steuben Co., Tributary Lake Lonidaw, 10 km NNW Angola, Potawatomi State Park, Potawatomi Nature Preserve, 41.7091, - 85.0150, 3/10/2006, R.E. DeWalt, 6♂, 4♀ (INHS); same location, 3/9/2008, R.E. DeWalt, D.W. Webb, 5♂, 2♀ (INHS).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".