MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6950038811 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.15343128

Erinaceusyllis hartmannschroederae Martin, 2005, n.sp.

2005· article· en· W6950038811 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicIchthyology and Marine Biology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNorth westFront (military)West coastNova scotiaQueen (butterfly)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Erinaceusyllis hartmannschroederae n.sp. Figs. 38A–I, 39A–F Sphaerosyllis erinaceus.–not Claparède, 1863; Hartmann-Schröder, 1982: 69; 1983: 134; 1984: 22; 1985: 70; 1986: 43; 1989: 28; 1991: 39. Material examined. AUSTRALIA: NEW SOUTH WALES. HOLOTYPE: AM W26447, 100 m north west of Julian Rocks, Byron Bay, 28°36.8'S 153°37.8'E, shell and gravel, 15 m, E.L. Albertson, R.T. et al., 3 Mar 1992. PARATYPES: 36 specimens, AM W26448, 100 m north west of Julian Rocks, Byron Bay, 28°36.8'S 153°37.8'E, shell and gravel, 15 m, E.L. Albertson et al., 3 Mar 1992. QUEENSLAND. 1 specimen, AM W26565, Halifax Bay, north of Townsville, 19°10'S 146°38'E, 5 m, Queensland Nickel Pty Ltd, July 1977. 1 specimen,AM W26569, Halifax Bay, north of Townsville, 19°10'S 146°38'E, 5 m, Queensland Nickel Pty Ltd, July 1977. 1 specimen, AM W26571, Halifax Bay, north of Townsville, 19°10'S 146°44'E, 5 m, Queensland Nickel Pty Ltd, July 1977. 2 specimens, and 4 specimens on SEM stub, AM W26935, Hinchinbrook Channel, 18°20'S 146°4'E, tidal flats (mud & sand), S. Dittmann, 14 Oct 1989. VICTORIA. 1 specimen, MV F87430, Geelong Arm of Port Phillip Bay, Victoria, 38°09.3'S 144°42.7'E, sand & seagrass, 3 m depth, 11 June 1971. TASMANIA. 42 specimens, AM W27670, north end of beach, Parsons Cove, Freycinet National Park, 42°08.6'S 148°16.9'E, clean gravelly sand, intertidal, 0 m, N.W. Riser, 24 Jan 1986. WESTERN AUSTRALIA. 1 specimen, AM W27645, north end of beach, Bundegi Reef, Exmouth Gulf, 21°49'S 114°11'E, rocky rubble, brown algae with epiphytes, sediment, 2 m, H.E. Stoddart, 4 Jan 1984. Description. Body small, slender, up to 3 mm long, 0.23 mm wide, 30 chaetigers, with scattered, short papillae on dorsum (Figs. 38A, 39A–D), slightly longer laterally, also on parapodia and cirri. Prostomium oval, slightly wider than long; 4 large eyes in trapezoidal arrangement, nearly in line, and 2 anterior eyespots; antennae with bulbous bases and short tips; median antenna shorter than combined length of prostomium and palps, inserted slightly anterior to posterior eyes; lateral antennae shorter than median antenna, inserted on anterior margin, slightly posterior and lateral to eyespots. Palps shorter than prostomium, fused along their length. Peristomium forming a trilobed hood, covering dorsally the posterior margin of prostomium (Figs. 38A, 39D); tentacular cirri similar to antennae but slightly smaller. Nuchal organs small, densely ciliated, protected by an anterior lip (Fig. 39E). Dorsal cirri similar to antennae, longer than tentacular cirri, with bulbous bases and short tips, absent on chaetiger 2 (Figs. 38A, 39D), elongate in midbody and posterior parapodia (Figs. 38B, 39C). Parapodia rectangular to conical, with two small, distal papillae. Compound chaetae heterogomph, shafts apparently smooth (Fig. 38E,G) but provided with fine subdistal spines (Fig. 39F); blades short, falcate, unidentate, all similar in length, about 13–10 µm on midbody; margin of blades provided with long, slender spines on 2–3 most superior compound chaetae, remaining blades smooth (Figs. 38E,G, 39F); anterior parapodia each with 6–7 compound chaetae, diminishing in number progressively posteriorly to 5 on each posterior parapodia. Dorsal simple chaetae from anterior parapodia, usually from chaetiger 1, unidentate, provided with short marginal spines (Fig. 38C) or smooth (Fig. 38F). Ventral simple chaetae slender, smooth, unidentate (Fig. 38H), on posterior parapodia.Acicula solitary, acuminate (Fig. 38D,I). Pharynx through 4 segments; pharyngeal tooth, near opening (Fig. 38A). Proventricle long and wide, barrel-shaped, through 3–4 segments, with about 18–20 muscle cell rows. Pygidium semi-circular, with two anal cirri similar to dorsal cirri but longer, and several papillae (Fig. 38B). Remarks. This species was widely reported in Australia as Sphaerosyllis erinaceus and S. erinaceus erinaceus, a species described from Northern Europe, reported widely all around the world, from Arctic, temperate, tropical, to Antarctic seas. This appear to be a complex of species, in need of revision. There is not a recent redescription of the European specimens, which would probably clarify the situation. Fauvel (1923) states that the blades of the compound chaetae are long and slender, different from the short, falcate blades of the Australian specimens, suggesting that they are different species. Recently, I have examined some specimens from Spitzbergen identified as Sphaerosyllis erinaceus in the HZM collections and the compound chaetae are distinctly different to those reported from Australia, which are in fact a mixture of several of the species herein described in Erinaceusyllis. Imajima (1966) reported and described S. erinaceus from Japan, which agree quite well with the specimens from Spitzbergen, and these specimens are similar to E. hartmannschroederae n.sp., but the blades show distinct dorsoventral gradation in length. Several subspecies of S. erinaceus have been described from several areas, on the basis of differences in the shape and size of the compound chaetae; these differences are sufficiently important to consider them as distinct species. Distribution. Australia (all states). Habitat.All kind of sediments, intertidal to about 15 m depth. Etymology. The species is named in honour to Dr Gesa Hartmann-Schröder, who reported and described many species of syllids from Australia and worldwide.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.046

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicIchthyology and Marine Biology→French-language works237,207→