Sasquacapnia sasquatchi Broome & Stark & Baumann 2019
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Sasquacapnia sasquatchi (Ricker, 1965), New combination http://lsid.speciesfile.org/urn:lsid: Plecoptera.speciesfile.org: TaxonName:505899 (Figs. 67-72) Capnia (Bolshecapnia) sasquatchi Ricker, 1965:482. Holotype ♂ (Canadian National Collection), Fraser River near Agassiz, British Columbia Bolshecapnia sasquatchi: Ricker & Scudder, 1975:338 Distribution. CANADA: BC (Ricker 1965, DeWalt et al. 2018), UNITED STATES: WA ( DeWalt et al. 2018, Kondratieff & Lechleitner 2002). Material examined. CANADA: British Columbia: Fraser River, near Agassiz, 49.206 N, - 121.777 W, 21 February 1958, W.E. Ricker, Holotype ♂ (CNC). Manning Park, Skagit River, 18 February 1983, S.G. Cannings, 1♂ (UBCZ). Manning Park, Similkameen River, 19 March 1983, S.G. Cannings, 1♂ (UBCZ). UNITED STATES: Washington: Pierce Co., Ohanapecosh River, Mount Rainier National Park, 17 March 1970, R.A. Haick, 1♂ (BYU). Same site, 17 March 1970, D.S. Potter, 2♂ (BYU). Same site, 16 March 1973, D.S. Potter, L.M. Preble, 1♂ (BYU). Whatcom Co., Razor Hone Creek, Hwy 542, Mount Baker National Forest, 4 March 1967, K.E. Vander Mey, 2♂, 6♀ (BYU). Male epiproct (n = 3). Length 718 μm, width at midlength about 147 μm, width near base 158 μm, greatest width 194 μm, subapical width at narrowest point 70 μm. Epiproct body broad basally and narrowed gradually to subapical bottleneck (Figs. 67, 70-71) in dorsal and lateral aspect; apex bearing complexly lobed membranous tissue above a well formed ventral lip (Figs. 69, 71). Median groove well developed, with a pair of parallel ridges extending subapically to near base of dorsobasal sclerites (Figs. 67, 70). Dorsobasal sclerites short, broad and apically pointed (Figs. 68, 72). Tergal process (n = 2). A pair of hairy, low rounded hump-like structures located on tergum 9 (Figs. 67, 71). Vesicle (n = 3). Similar to S. missiona but slightly more rounded in ventral aspect. Female subgenital plate (n = 1). Correctly associated and illustrated in figs. 13-14, by Baumann & Potter (2007). Ricker’s earlier figure for this structure is now attributed to S. missiona (Baumann & Potter 2007). The posterior margin of the plate is truncate and scarcely projects beyond the posterior margin of sternum 8. Larva. Unknown.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.073 | 0.028 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".