MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6950056875 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.4555630

Typhlodromus (Anthoseius) rhenanus

2021· article· en· W6950056875 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBotany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOfficinalisRosmarinusEastern PolandThymus vulgarisWestern europe

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Typhlodromus (Anthoseius) rhenanus (Oudemans, 1905) Seiulus rhenanus Oudemans, 1905: 78. Typhlodromella rhenana.—Evans & Momen, 1988: 210. Typhlodromus (Anthoseius) rhenanus.— Papadoulis et al., 2009: 127. Material examined. USA: one female (HAL 095G065) from Thymus vulgaris (Lamiaceae), 2 Nov 2006. Netherlands: one female (HAL 098B507) from Rosmarinus officinalis (Lamiaceae), 2 Oct 2009; one female (HAL 100B067) from R. officinalis (Lamiaceae), 19 May 2011; six females (HAL 101B182) from R. officinalis (Lamiaceae), 30 Mar 2012. Previous records. Africa: Algeria (Athias-Henriot 1957b), Tunisia (Kreiter et al. 2002). Asia:Azerbaijan (Gadzhiev & Abbasova 1965), Cyprus (Georghiou 1959), India (Narayanan & Ghai 1961), Iran (Khalil-Manesh 1973), Israel (Swirski & Amitai 1961), Kazakhstan (Andreeva 1966), Syria (Barbar 2013), Turkey (Çobanoðlu 1989a). Europe: Belarus (Sidlyarevich 1966), Belgium (Nesbitt 1951), Denmark (Hansen & Johnsen 1986), England (Nesbitt 1951), Finland (Tuovinen & Rokx 1991), France (Nesbitt 1951), Germany (Oudemans 1905 a), Greece (Papadoulis et al. 2009), Hungary (Kropczynska & Jenser 1968), Italy (Gunthart 1960), Latvia (Salmane & Petrova 2002), Moldova (Kolodochka 1980 b), Montengro (Mijuskovic & Tomasevic 1975), Netherlands (Miedema 1987), Norway (Edland 1987), Poland (Suski 1961), Portugal (Carmona 1962), Russia (Beglyarov 1957), Serbia (Radivojević & Petanović 1984), Slovakia (Fend’a 2010), Slovenia (Bohinc & Trdan 2013), Spain (Iraola et al. 1997), Sweden (Steeghs et al. 1993), Switzerland (Gunthart 1960), Ukraine (Kolodochka 1974). North America: Canada (Nesbitt 1951), USA (Nesbitt 1951). South America: Brazil (Diehl et al. 2012); Remarks. The species is distributed worldwide, except in Oceania. Chant (1959) reported the species after Oudemans (1905) described it. Subsequent researchers provided conflicting opinions on the species status. Evans & Momen (1988) examined the type materials of the species and related species and provided a detailed redescription.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicBotany, Ecology, and Taxonomy StudiesFrench-language works237,207