MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6950086959 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.5223079

Perilampus yemenensis Yoo and Darling 2021, n. sp.

2021· article· en· W6950086959 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSubterranean biodiversity and taxonomy
Canadian institutionsRoyal Ontario Museum
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCrestOcciputGroove (engineering)HolotypeSternumDorsumTuft

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Perilampus yemenensis Yoo and Darling n. sp. Figures 10A‒F, 11A‒E, Appendix 1 Material examined. Holotype. “ Yemen: Abyan, Al Kowd, 13°5'0"N, 45°22'0"E, 1-5 Sep 2001, A van Harten; S Al Haruri, Light trap ”, “Digital Image Voucher 2019, Royal Ontario Museum”. The holotype is point-mounted (Female: ROME159199, ROME). Paratype. Yemen: Abyan, Al Kowd, 13°5'0"N, 45°22'0"E: Jul-Sep 2001, A van Harten; S Al Haruri, Malaise trap (1 female: ROME159195 - EAD); (1 male: DCD Slide #2251 ♂ genitalia, ROME159193 - ROME). Etymology. The specific epithet is a reference to Yemen, the only country where specimens of this species have been collected. Description. Length: approximately 1.8‒2.3 mm (HT 2.1 mm). Color: black, scutellum with blue iridescent reflections, dorsellum black with blue reflections. Legs: coxae black, hind femora black or brown, pro and meso femora and tibiae brown, lighter distad and on inner surfaces, with weak blue reflections, tarsi brown. Antennae: scape brown, lighter distad, pedicel and flagellum brown. Head: (Figs 10B, 10C) in frontal view quadrate, slightly wider than high, HW/HH approximately 1.2, sparsely setose to smooth; in dorsal view weakly transverse (Fig. 10B), width same or slightly greater than twice length, HW/HL 2.0–2.1; wider than pronotum, HW/PW approximately 1.3. Frontal carina: absent. Scrobal cavity: shallow; weak round swelling originating from between median and lateral ocelli extend towards eye margin. Ocelli: large; forming a wide triangle, POL about twice distance between posterior and anterior ocelli; POL very long,>2.5× OOL. Vertex: rounded behind; smooth, interocellar region with long groove originating from occiput to anterior ocellus (Fig. 10B, arrow); occiput with median furrow delimited below vertex, with costulae. Outer orbits: smooth, strong costulae behind. Inner orbits: in lateral view, nearly parallel to inner eye margin; smooth. Malar space: short, about 0.2× eye height, MS/EH approximately 0.2; malar sulcus distinct; very weakly coriarious (Fig. 10C). Clypeus: weakly transverse, wider than high, CW/ CH approximately 1.7–1.8, trapezoidal, lateral sulci weak and straight or weakly rounded, weakly divergent; epistomal sulcus straight or weakly concave, same strength as lateral sulci, only slightly extended ventrad; lower margin convex. Supraclypeal area: subquadrate, 0.7–0.8× CH. Antenna: scape length approximately 0.5× EH; anellus length approximately 0.1× PL; F1 subquadrate, shorter than pedicel, F1L/PL approximately 0.6–0.7, F2 subquadrate, F3–F7 transverse; clava 4-segmented, with distinct terminal button. Mesosoma (Figs 10A, 10D, 10E, 10F, 11A): length approximately 1.3× maximum width. Pronotum in dorsal view: short, about 0.25× length of mesoscutum, PN/MSC 0.2–0.3; shorter along midline, 0.5‒0.6× length laterad; anterior margin sharp, the first row of punctures slightly lower; without flange on lateral panel of pronotum at the level of mesothoracic spiracle. Lateral panel of pronotum: slightly wider than prepectus, LPP/PPT approximately 1.2–1.3; flat, with 3 rows of punctures and wide coriarious interspaces dorsad, ventrad with wide coriarious patch; anterior margin slightly rounded; posterior margin ventrad grooved, with row of alveolae. Prepectus (Fig. 10D): narrow; nearly indistinguishable from pronotum, without distinct suture; ventral strap long (Fig. 10D, arrow), with row of alveolae; central area smooth, with foveae along dorsal and posterior margins. Femoral depression: nearly smooth. Midlobe of mesoscutum (Fig. 11A): without transverse tubercle; punctures rounded to weakly angulate, with wide and coriarious interspaces. Lateral lobe of mesoscutum: smooth dorsad; coriarious-punctate laterad. Scutellum: about as long as mesoscutum, SC/MSC approximately 1.1; posterior margin smoothly rounded; punctures rounded to weakly angulate, with wide and coriarious interspaces. Axilla: punctate dorsad, imbricate below. Axillula: short triangular lobe, shorter than width at base, smooth. Propodeum (Fig. 10E): length along midline about 0.3× width of propodeum; submedian area imbricate, with weak groove along median carina; weakly imbricate laterad; plicae incomplete laterad, delimited ventrad by plicae, dorsad by transverse band of foveae; propodeal spiracle margin narrowly foveate ventrad; nucha rugulose. Fore wing (Fig. 10F): postmarginal vein long, 0.8‒0.9× length of marginal vein, 1.4‒1.6× length of stigmal vein; stigmal vein with weak uncus. Metasoma: petiole short with large smooth to weakly rugulose raised scale (10E, arrow); Gt2 smooth, posterior margin weakly concave at middle; Gt3 smooth. Male. Length: approximately 1.7mm. Color, structure, and sculptures similar to female except as follows: Head (Fig. 11B): in dorsal view quadrate. Ocelli: larger. Malar space: shorter, with stronger coriarious sculpture (Fig. 11C). Scape (Fig. 11D): about 0.5× EH; weakly stout, length about 4.7× width above radicle; strongly expanded distad, about 1.2× width above radicle; punctures covering about 0.4× scape length, with slightly wide interspaces. Mesosoma: more elongate, length approximately 1.4× maximum width. Gt3: weakly imbricate dorsad. Aedeagus: with paired lateral spines (Fig. 11K, arrow). Diagnosis. The following combination of characters will distinguish P. yemenensis from the other species of the P. tristis species group: postmarginal vein longer than stigmal vein (Fig. 10F), indistinct suture between prepectus and pronotum (Fig. 10D), strongly imbricate submedian area of propodeum (Fig. 10E), mesonotum with coriarious interspaces (Fig. 11A), weakly bluish iridescence on scutellum, coriarious malar region, which is stronger in male (Figs 10C, 11C), and slightly stout male scape with large punctures covering slightly less than 0.5 scape length (Fig. 11D).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.146 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicSubterranean biodiversity and taxonomy→French-language works237,207→