MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6950093716 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.4331300

Biapertura ossiani Sinev 2020, comb. nov.

2020· article· en· W6950093716 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicColeoptera Taxonomy and Distribution
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHolotypeDorsumParthenogenesisCrustaceanInstarClaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Biapertura ossiani (Sinev, 1998) comb. nov. Sars 1901: 48–49, pl. IX, figs 1a–d (Alona affinis); Daday 1905: 171–172, Pl. 10, Fig. 25–24 (Alona affinis); Sinev 1998: 103110, Fig. 1–3 (Alona); Sinev & Silva–Briano 2012: 20, Fig. 10 K–M (Alona); Sinev 2013: 330–335, Fig. 1–3 (Alona). Type locality. Neighborhood of Sao Paolo, Brazil. Type material. Holotype (adult male) and paratypes (2 disected parthenogenetic females, 63 parthenogenetic females, 7 ephippial females, 10 males, 1 juvenile male of instar II) at Zoological Museum of Oslo University, access numbers F12324a for holotype, F12324b-d for paratypes. Material studied earlier. See Sinev (1998, 2013) for the list of material studied earlier and for detailed description. Diagnosis. Parthenogenetic female. Body oval or slightly ovoid, maximum height at the midline or behind it, height/length ratio about 0.6 in adults. Postero-dorsal angle with 6–8 groups of setulae, with 5–8 setulae in each. Main head pores with PP 1.5–2 in adults. Lateral head pores located about 1 IP distance from midline, at level of anterior major head pore or before it. Postabdomen (Fig. 16 E) subrectangular, with parallel margins, weakly narrowing at the end; length about 2.5 height; dorsal margin weakly convex in postanal portion and weakly concave in anal one, with distal part about 2.5 times longer than preanal one, with postanal portion 2.5–2.8 times longer than anal one; postanal margin (Fig. 16 F) with 12–14 massive denticles, each with 1–7 (usually 3–5) spinulae along anterior margin; postabdominal claw (Fig. 16 G) with basal spine about 0.25–0.35 length of the claw. Antenna (Fig. 16 H) with basal and distal segments of both branches of similar length, middle segment being shortest, about 1.5 shorter than two others; spine on basal segment of exopodite longer than middle segment; spines on apical segments shorter than apical segments. Limb I (Fig. 16 I) with IDL claw-like seta 1; seta e of endite 2 two times longer than seta f. Male. Length of adult 0.60–0.63 mm. Body low oval (Fig. 16K, N), with maximum height near the middle, height/length ratio about 0.54. Postabdomen (Fig. 16L, O) of moderate size, with almost parallel margins; length about 2.5 height; ventral margin straight; postabdominal claw situated on small protrusion in ventral portion of convex distal margin; the sperm ducts open above the protrusion; posteroventral and posterodorsal angles rounded; dorsal margin weakly convex in postanal portion and weakly concave in anal one; preanal angle weakly defined; postanal angle not defined; preanal margin almost straight; distal portion of postabdomen two times longer than preanal one, postanal portion two times longer than anal one. Postabdominal claw weakly curved, shorter than in female, as long as preanal margin; basal spine about 0.25–0.3 length of claw. Thoracic limb I (Fig. 16 I,M) with IDL seta 1 well-developed, about 2/3 length of IDL seta 2, located terminally; anterior face of the limb under the copulatory brush with row of 10–12 stiff setulae of moderate length; outer face of endite 3 with two rows of about 10 shorter setulae, separated by a wide gap. Differential diagnosis. B. ossiani clearly differs from B. affinis in morphology of male postabdomen and in well-developed seta 1 on IDL of male limb I; from B. martensi and B. elliptica in female postabdomen not narrowing distally and in smaller IP/PP ratio; from B. sibirica in absence of denticles on posteroventral margin of valves, from B. kendallensis in much smaller IP–PP ratio; from B. lepida in claw-like IDL seta 1. Distribution. Nearctic and Neotropic regions from South Canada to South Argentina and Chile.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.051

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.164 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicColeoptera Taxonomy and DistributionFrench-language works237,207