Platystethynium (Platypatasson) fransseni
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Platystethynium (Platypatasson) fransseni (Ogloblin, 1946) (Figs 18–26) Platypatasson fransseni Ogloblin, 1946: 293; holotype ♀ (USNM). Type locality: Indonesia, Java, Bogor. Subba Rao, 1970: 664 (distribution, male description). Remarks. Subba Rao (1970) briefly described and illustrated the male of this species, identified by him as Platypatasson fransseni, and his species identification is confirmed here. Subba Rao mentioned that he had remounted the 70 specimens, including 2 males, from Canada balsam into chloral hydrate but he did not state how many slides he had made. We borrowed the only two slides that could so far be found. Careful examination by both N. Dale-Skey (NHMUK) and J. Huber failed to locate either of the two male specimens on these slides. There should therefore be at least one other slide with these males. Twenty-two females on one slide (NHMUK), labelled: “New Guinea, Manaus.- 1932, J.L. Froggatt, ex eggs of locustid.” and “ Platypatasson fransseni A. Ogloblin B.R. Subba det. 1969” were examined. The mounting medium of the second slide, somewhat similarly labelled, was completely dark brown so almost nothing could be seen. The head in dorsal view (Fig. 22), a pair of wings (Fig. 21) and two sets of antennae (Figs 18–20) from specimens on the first slide are illustrated for comparison with the wings and antennae of a paratype of P. fransseni in the CNC (Figs 23, 24). The short lateral seta on the vertex between the median ocellus and transverse trabecula is apparently absent. The fore wings are almost identical, with two distinct rows of microtrichia in the basal half beyond the apex of the venation, but the antennae vary slightly. Measurements are: clava length/width 2.12–2.60 (the two Papua New Guinea specimens) compared to 2.86 (the paratype). Simple inspection of the funicle segments, especially the apical segment, shows that length/width differs, in this case mainly because of apparently different orientation (dorsal versus lateral, especially the scape and pedicel) of each pair of antennae. Distribution. Indonesia, Papua New Guinea.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".