Bibliographic record
Abstract
155. Cylindroiulus londinensis (Leach, 1814) Iulus londinensis Leach, 1814. Distribution ES-SPA, FR-FRA, GB-GRB, IE. Atlantic. Habitat Woodland and open habitats, until above the tree line up to 2000 m, common on calcareous soils, but also present on brown earths and on well-drained acidic sandy soils. In Britain and Ireland not yet found on heaths, moorland, wetland or in synanthropic habitats (Lee 2006). In deciduous, mixed or coniferous (Pinus) forest; frequently in Fagus forests and also in Quercus woodland, sometimes with Carpinus and/ or Buxus, often with Castanea, Fraxinus, Tilia, Betula, Corylus, in scrubby land with Prunus, Cornus, Ligustrum, Juniperus, Ruscus. At least in the south of its range in Spain it is found in evergreen Quercus stands. It is associated with a wide range of ground floras, occurring principally in litter and logs, descending into the topsoil during unfavourable weather. Common in Atlantic woods in France, on many types of parent rock, e.g., limestone, sandstone, schist, granite, volcanic, at the same time notably unrecorded from the eastern departments. Remarks There are correct records only from the countries listed above. All the references to this species in the literature from other countries relate to C. caeruleocinctus, with which it was formerly confused. In Spain, north of 42° N we are absolutely sure that our records do relate to C. londinensis, but, because of its strongly Atlantic distribution we are not certain if the three records in the literature shown south of 42° N relate to it or not, especially because when Ceuca (1972) made them, at two of the same sites he also identified Cylindroiulus finitimus, which he equated with C. londinensis var. finitimus and C. teutonicus, although the latter is now known to be a different species (C. caeruleocinctus). The previous nomenclatural confusion was rectified by Mauriès (1964), who demonstrated the specific differences between C. caeruleocinctus, C. finitimus and C. londinensis, making it clear that they were not all varieties of C. londinensis as many authors then believed. Blower (1985) gave an explanation of the confusion.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.018 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".