Trichiosomites obliviosus Brues, 1908 Brues 1908
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Trichiosomites obliviosus Brues, 1908 Figs. 24–25. Trichiosomites obliviosus Brues, 1908 p. 260, Fig. 1. Holotype. Holotype MCZ 2036, Brues (1908). A rather complete female with head present, but positioned under thorax (not missing as Brues 1908 presumed). Diagnosis. As for genus. Description. Holotype MCZ 2036 (Fig. 24), female. Body: head length 0.5 mm or slightly more, width 0.87 mm; thorax length ca. 2.5 mm; abdomen length ca. 5 mm; body colouration unknown by preservation. Forewing: length ca. 6.0 mm, estimated maximum width ca. 2.0 mm, length/width: ca. 3.0. UCM 4570 (Fig. 25), female. Body: length ca. 9.2 mm; head, antenna dark; thorax dark, wings including pterostigma light; abdomen light. Head difficult to interpret as preserved; moderately transverse, occiput long, three distinct ocelli in low triangle, compound eyes not preserved, sole funicular segment thin, slightly more than half length of club; club expands gradually over three segments (“drop-like”). Thoracic dorsum only partially visible as preserved, median longitudinal mesonotal sulcus and notauli present; mesopleuron with no mesopleural sulcus visible. Forewing: membrane hyaline, length ca. 6.5 mm; maximum width estimated ca. 2.5 mm, length/width: ca. 2.6; pterostigma wide, ca. as cell 2r; R+M shorter than 1-M; maximum length of cell 2r shorter than 3r; 2r-rs longer than Rs between 2r-m, 2r-rs, joining Rs near middle of cell 3rm; 2r-rm straight, short, joins M at 2m-cu; 1-M curved; cell 1mcu with M, 1m-cu sub-parallel; 3r-m straight; cell 2mcu with M slightly longer than 1m-cu; 2m-cu straight; cu-a postfurcal; anal cell separated by 1A fusion with 2A+3A (no crossvein) for length of about a third length of cell 2a. Abdomen: long, wide; ovipositor thick, not exceeding abdomen apex. Material. Holotype and UCM 4570, a rather complete specimen missing only the legs and much of the hind wings. Locality and age. Florissant Formation, Priabonian.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".