MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6950128061 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.5465158

Megalopinus nepalensis Puthz 2012, nov.sp.

2012· article· de· W6950128061 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2012
Typearticle
Languagede
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicOrthoptera Research and Taxonomy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKhasi

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Megalopinus nepalensis nov.sp. (Abb. 22, 44, 92) Typus material Holotypus (): NEPAL: Khandbari Distr., Arun River at Num, 1500- 1600m, 10.IV.1982, A. & Z. Smetana. Paratypen: 1: Kosi, Val Arun au-dessous de Num, près du pont principal, 1050m, forêt hygrophile à palmiers, 21.IV.1984, Löbl & Smetana; 1: Umg. Pokhara, 1977, H. Franz (Pa 332); 1: INDIA: Meghalaya, Khasi Hills, en-dessous de Cherrapunjee, 1200m, tamisage en forêt au pied de rochers, 26.X.1978, Besuchet & Löbl; 1: Khasi Hills, entre Mwsynram et Balat, à 16 km de Mwsynram, 1000m, sous des écorces et des polypores, 27.X.1978, Besuchet & Löbl.- HT in coll. Smetana, Ottawa, PTT im MHNG, NHMW und in cP. Beschreibung Glänzend, schwarz, Elytren mit rötlichgelber Zeichnung in der Vorderhälfte (Abb. 44) und drei Punktreihen. Seitenstrich des 5. Tergits bis zur Tergitmitte reichend. 10. Tergit wenig fein, mässig dicht auf fein punktuliertem Grund punktiert. Fühler rötlichbraun. Beine gelblichbraun. Länge: 2,6-2,9mm (Vorderkörperlänge: 1,6-1,7mm). PM des HT: HW: 39; DE: 23; PW: 32; PL: 27; EW: 39; EL: 29; SL: 23. Männchen: 11. Fühlerglied 4x so lang und 1,1x so breit wie das 10. Glied. 8. Sternit am Hinterrand flach und breit ausgerandet. Aedoeagus (Abb. 92) dem des M. hirashimai NAOMI sehr ähnlich, die inneren Haken aber länger und schmäler; Parameren apikal mit 8 Borsten. Weibchen: 11. Fühlerglied 3,0x so lang und 1,1x so breit wie das 10. Glied. Kopf etwa so breit wie die Elytren, Stirn sehr grob und wenig dicht punktiert. Pronotum deutlich breiter als lang, Seitenzähnchen deutlich vortretend, Punktierung in den tiefen Querfurchen grob (Abb. 22). Elytren erheblich breiter als lang, Punktierung: 5,7,6/6,6,6; 5,7,7/6,8,3; 4,8,4[1/2]8,8,5; 3,4,5/6,6,3; 4,6,4/4,5,2. Differenzial diagnose Diese neue Art ähnelt dem M. hirashimai NAOMI stark, auch genitaliter, und gehört möglicherweise sogar in dessen Variationsbreite. Die bemerkbaren Unterschiede im Innenbau des Aedoeagus und die hinten neben der Naht dunklen Elytren legitimieren jedoch beim gegenwärtigen Kenntnisstand den Artstatus. Etymologie: Der Name leitet sich vom Fundort des Holotypus ab.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.574
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0860.077

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicOrthoptera Research and TaxonomyFrench-language works237,207