MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6950211565 · doi:10.5284/1125132

Archaeological trial-trenching evaluation at Colchester County High School for Girls, Norman Way, Colchester, Essex

2014· article· en· W6950211565 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueArchaeology Data Service · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical and Cultural Archaeology Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDitchSquare (algebra)Context (archaeology)FootprintExcavationQuarter (Canadian coin)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This section gives an archaeological summary of the evaluation trenches (T1- T2), with context and finds dating information. The site is an area of grassed open ground to the south of the main school buildings and contains three re-locatable classrooms (two currently unused). The evaluation trenches were excavated under archaeological supervision using a tracked excavator. The County High School for Girls (CHSG) is within both the oppidum of Camulodunum and the Roman town's western cemetery. Two evaluation trenches (total length, 16m) were positioned within the footprint of the proposed new sixth form block to be situated in what is now an open grassed square occupied by three re-locatable classrooms. One archaeological feature was revealed by the evaluation: a Roman ditch dating to the later 1st century AD. The ditch was aligned at right-angles to the defensive triple-ditches seen on the school site in 1955, and was parallel to ditches seen on the St Benedict's School site in 1939 (ie, the Heath farm Dyke North). What is unclear is whether the 2014 ditch is merely an agricultural field ditch, or whether it is part of a wider defensive scheme including the Heath Farm Dyke and the triple-ditches on the CHSG site.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.149
Threshold uncertainty score0.295

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0050.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0400.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.106
GPT teacher head0.351
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArchaeology Data ServiceSame topicHistorical and Cultural Archaeology StudiesFrench-language works237,207