Comparison Between Sentinel-2 and Landsat in Mapping Mangroves in The Gambia Using the Google Earth Engine Mangrove Mapping Methodology (GEM v2)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mangroves play a vital role in coastal environments by supporting biodiversity, protecting shorelines, and storing carbon. However, these ecosystems are under growing pressure from land use change, development, and rising sea levels. Monitoring changes in mangrove cover is essential for guiding conservation and management efforts, but on the ground, methods are often time-consuming, expensive, and difficult to carry out across large or remote areas. This is where remote sensing offers a practical solution. By using satellite imagery, it becomes possible to track changes in mangrove extent over time, detect patterns of loss and regrowth, and support decision-making at both local and national levels. This study compared the effectiveness of Sentinel-2 and Landsat satellite data in mapping mangrove dynamics in The Gambia, using the Google Earth Engine Mangrove Mapping Methodology version 2 (GEM v2) from Blue Venture, a marine and conservation organization. A Random Forest classifier was applied to classify land cover types, and the accuracy of each dataset was evaluated. Sentinel-2 was better at detecting small, detailed changes, including narrow strips of loss and early signs of regrowth. Landsat, while less detailed, provided more stable classifications across broader areas. Sentinel-2 also showed greater variation in spectral data, which led to more classification errors in some mangrove classes, while Landsat maintained higher overall accuracy. The results show that both datasets have strengths, Sentinel-2 is well-suited for close-up monitoring of small-scale changes, while Landsat is reliable for long-term, large-scale analysis. A combined approach using both sensors may offer the complete overview of mangrove change. Future studies should consider using field data from the same area to improve classification accuracy and support more effective monitoring and protection of mangrove ecosystems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".