Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tarsonemus waitei Banks Tarsonemus waitei Banks, 1912: 96; Beer, 1954: 1181; Lindquist, 1978: 1024. Tarsonemus setifer Ewing, 1939:19 (synonymy according to Lindquist, 1978). Tarsonemus pauperoseatus Suski, 1967: 267 (synonymy according to Lindquist, 1978). Material examined: São Carlos: Campomanesia pubescens (DC.) Berg, X2000 (1); Myrcia venulosa DC., X2000 (2). Pirassununga: M. venulosa, XI2000 (1); Psidium guajava L., VII2000 (1); Psidium guineense Sw., XI2000 (4). Luiz Antonio: P. c i n e re u m Mart. Ex DC., X2000 (1). Previous records (Lin & Zhang, 2002): Brazil, Canada, China, Congo, Costa Rica, Egypt, Korea, New Zealand, Poland, Portugal, Turkey, Ukraine and USA. Remarks: the measurements of the five adult females collected in this study are close to those given by Lindquist (1978) for type series from USA. The average measurements of the specimens collected are given subsequently. Gnathosoma: length 36 (34–37), maximum width 29 (27–33), seta ch 13,5 (13–15), seta vm 10,5 (10–11), pharynx 11 (10–12) long by 5 (4–6) wide at widest region. Idiosoma: length 182 (175–200) (excluding gnathosoma) maximum width 106 (100–125). Dorsal setae: v1 27 (25–28), sc1 13 (12–14), sc2 105 (100–110), c1 12 (10–13), c2 30 (24–35), d 12 (10–16), e 11 (9–12), f 13 (11–15), h 11 (10–13). Distances between setae: v1–v1 23 (21–26), sc2–sc2 40 (36–48), v1 –sc2 27 (24– 29), c1–c1 48 (43–55) c2–c2 87 (77–100), c1–c2 25 (20–30), d–d 30 (27–33), f–f 20 (17– 22), e–f 18 (15–23), h–h 29 (28–32). Ventral setae: 1a 10, 2 a 14 (12–15), 3a 15 (12–18), 3b 12 (10–15). Tegula 15 (13–17) long and 21 (18–23) wide. Setae of legs: leg I: 4, 1 3 (2–3), k 5, d of tibia 33 (31–35); leg II: 3 (3–4), d of tibia 22 (20–25); leg IV: v’ F 10 (9– 11), v’G 11 (10–11), v’Ti 24 (23–25), tc’’ 97 (92–100).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".