Bibliographic record
Abstract
Thereva cingulata Kröber Specimens examined (11). BC: Ashcroft, Oregon Jack Creek; Dog Creek; Ilgatchuz Mountains, Pan Creek; Osoyoos, Mount Kobau summit (Fig. 17); Rainbow Mountains, East Branch Trail. RBCM. Database and literature records (24). BC: Cariboo, Springhouse; Chilcotin; Chilcotin Ranges; Kamloops; Keremeos; Lac la Hache, Provincial Park; Lac la Hache, Crystal Springs Campsite; Lillooet; McQueen Lake; Oliver, UBC Geology Camp; Quesnel; Soda Creek. CASC, CNCI, EMEC, MEI, SEM. Conservation status. BC: S4 Distributional notes. In British Columbia, T. cingulata is not known on the Coast; it is widespread in the southwestern Interior (Osoyoos, Ashcroft, Kamloops), north to the Cariboo-Chilcotin (Lac la Hache, Soda Creek, Ilgatchuz Mountains) and Peace River Region (Fort St. John). The species probably occurs east into the southern Rockies, based on Alberta and Montana distribution (Webb et al. 2013). Ecoprovinces and other designations. BC: Southern Interior, Central Interior, Boreal Plains. Range. Cordilleran. British Columbia east to Saskatchewan, south to New Mexico and Arizona (Webb et al. 2013). Biological notes. Flight period: 18 June–6 September. The fly has been collected in Pseudotsuga menziesii / Calamagrostis rubescens woods, subalpine woodland (Fig. 17), and grassland/ Pinus ponderosa parkland interface. Forest and steppe habitats are usual (Holston & Irwin 2005).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.024 | 0.010 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".