MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6950268418 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.6059913

Microctonus aethiops

2016· article· en· W6950268418 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicColeoptera Taxonomy and Distribution
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDistribution (mathematics)Range (aeronautics)Balkan peninsulaChinaCzech

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Microctonus aethiops (Nees von Esenbeck, 1834) Distribution in Iran. Alborz, Guilan, Mazandaran (Farahani et al. 2013b; Sedighi and Madjdzadeh 2015), Hamadan (Arbab and McNiell 2001 as Microctonus aethiopoides; Ghahari et al. 2010b; Sedighi and Madjdzadeh 2015 as Perilitus aethiopoides), Kermanshah (Ghahari et al. 2010b, Sedighi and Madjdzadeh 2015 as Perilitus aethiopoides), Kordestan (Samin 2015), Lorestan (Ghahari et al. 2012; Sedighi and Madjdzadeh 2015), Qazvin (Arbab and McNiell 2001 as Microctonus aethiopoides; Ghahari et al. 2010b; Farahani et al. 2013b; Sedighi and Madjdzadeh 2015), Iran (no specific locality) (Fallahzadeh and Saghaei 2010 as Perilitus (Microctonus) aethiopoides). Distribution outside Iran. One of the most common braconid species in the Holoarctic region (Papp 2011– 2012) and all Europe (Szépligeti 1904). Argentina, Armenia, Australia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Brazil, Bulgaria, Canada, Canary Islands, Chile, Czech Republic, Finland, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Latvia, Lithuania, Moldova, Morocco, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Romania, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Tajikistan, USA, Uruguay, Uzbekistan, former Yugoslavia (Yu et al. 2012 as Perilitus aethiops), Belgium (Wesmael 1835, 1838; Yu et al. 2012 as Perilitus aethiops), China (Chen and van Achterberg 1997 as Microctonus aethiopoides; Yu et al. 2012 as Perilitus aethiops), Croatia (Papp 2009b; Yu et al. 2012 as Perilitus aethiops), Greece (Papp 2003a; Yu et al. 2012 as Perilitus aethiops), Israel (Papp 2011–2012), Hungary (Papp 2008; Yu et al. 2012 as Perilitus aethiops), Macedonia (Papp 2010; Yu et al. 2012 as Perilitus aethiops), Korea (Papp 2003b as Microctonus aethiopoides; Yu et al. 2012 as Perilitus aethiops), Mongolia (Papp 2005 as Perilitus aethiopoides, 2009b; Yu et al. 2012 as Perilitus aethiops), Russia (Tobias 1971; Yu et al. 2012 as Perilitus aethiops), Serbia (Žikić et al. 2000; Yu et al. 2012 as Perilitus aethiops), Turkey (Koldaş et al. 2007, 2013; Yilmaz et al. 2010; Güçlü and Özbek 2011; Yu et al. 2012 as Perilitus aethiops), UK (Marshall 1887; Broad and Shaw 2009; Yu et al. 2012 as Perilitus aethiops). Host records. Phyllotreta nemorum (Linnaeus), P. vittula Redtenbacher (Coleoptera: Chrysomeloidea), Hypera brunneipennis (Boheman), H. melas (Fabricius), H. nigrirostris (Fabricius), H. postica (Gyllenhal), H. rumicis (Linnaeus), H. variabilis Herbst,, Irenimus aemulator Broun, I. aequalis Broun, I. duplex Broun, I. egens Broun, I. stolidus Broun, Listronotus bonariensis Kuschel, Nicaeana cervinus Boheman, Pantomorus cervinus Boheman, Prosayleus sp., Rhinocyllus conicus Frolich, Sitona bicolor Faehraeus, S. crinita (Herbst), S. cylindricollis Fahraeus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) (Yu et al. 2012), Coniocleonus excoriatus (Gyllenhal) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) (Papp 2011–2012). Tobias (1971) reported the following curculionid species (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) as hosts to this species: Sitona sp., Phytonomus meles Fabricius, Brachyderes incanus Linnaeus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Also, Arbab and McNiell (2001) reported it (as Microctonus aethiopoides) as the adult parasitoid of H. postica (Gyllenhal) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicColeoptera Taxonomy and DistributionFrench-language works237,207