Cyana puella subsp. puella puella (Drury 1773
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cyana puella puella (Drury, 1773) (Figs 42, 43, 186, 255) [Phal.[aena] Noct. [ua ]] Puella Drury, 1773, Illustrations of natural history 2: 3, pl. 2, fig. 2 (Type locality: [India, Madras] “Madrafs”). Material examined. HIMACHAL PRADESH: 3 ♂, Kangra valley, 4500 ft., VI.1889, Dudgeon, slide BMNH(E) Arct. -4483 ♂ (Coll. NHMUK); 2 ♂, 1 ♀, Kangra (Hocking) (Coll. NHMUK); 1 ♀, Dalhousie, 92–98, Harford Coll. (Coll. NHMUK); 1 ♀, Simla, 92–98 (Coll. NHMUK); 1 ♂, [Himachal Pradesh] Simla, India, VIII.1896, slide AV2052 ♂ Volynkin (Coll. ZFMK); 1 ♀, [Himachal Pradesh] Kulu distr., slide AV2053 ♀ Volynkin (Coll. ZFMK); 1 ♂, Himachal Pradesh, Solan, 31.VII.1994, leg. APS Kaleka (Coll. NZCZSI); 1 ♂, Himachal Pradesh, Nauni, 6.VII.2003, leg. Navneet Singh (Coll. NZCZSI); 1 ♂, Himachal Pradesh, Sabathu, 8.VII.2003, leg. Navneet Singh (Coll. NZCZSI); HARYANA: 1 ♂, 1 ♀, [Ambala district] Umballa distr. / Moore Coll. 94–106, slide BMNH(E) Arct. -2156 ♂ (Coll. NHMUK); UTTARAKHAND: 11 ♂, 3 ♀, India, Kumaon-Himalaya, Bhimtal, 1500 m, 22.III.–17.IV.74, leg. F. Smetaсek, slide MWM 34403 (♂) Volynkin (Coll. MWM / ZSM); 4 ♂, 1 ♀, India, Kumaon- Himalaya, Distr. Naini Tal, Bhim Tal 1500 m, Smetaсek / Bauer, 26.III.–30.III.1976 (Coll. MWM / ZSM); 2 ♂, 4 ♀, India, Himalaya, District Uttarkashi, Gangani, 14–19.VI.1981, 1300 m, leg. C. Holzschuh (Coll. MWM / ZSM); 1 ♂, 1 ♀, India, Himalaya, Dehra Dun, New Forest, 20–30.VI. 1981, 700 m, leg. C. Holzschuh (Coll. MWM / ZSM); 1 ♂, N India, Bhimtal, 1500m, 8–19.X.[19]80, Dr. Liedgens, slide MWM 34404 (♂) Volynkin (Coll. MWM / ZSM); 3 ♂, 4 ♀, India, Indian Himalaya, Uttaranchal, Nainital, Sathkol village, XI.2003, leg. Saluk (Coll. MWM / ZSM); 1 ♂, India, Nainital district (Kumaon), Bhimtal, 5–6.IX.1973, leg. Erich Bauer, slide AV2085 ♂ Volynkin (Coll. ZFMK); 1 ♂, Uttarakhand, Twaghat, 15.VI.2008, leg. Navneet Singh (Coll. NZCZSI); BIHAR: 1 ♂, Bihar, Ra- jgir, 21.VI.2013, leg. Navneet Singh (Coll. NZCZSI); MEGHALAYA: 2 ♂, 3 ♀, NE India, Assam, W Megha- laya, Garo Hills, Nokrek National Park, 25°40’N, 91°04’E, 1150 m, 2–13.VII 1997, leg. Afonin & Sinajev (Coll. MWM / ZSM); TAMIL NADU: 4 ♂, S. India / Tamil Nadu, Kalkad, Wildlife Sanctuary, Manimtar-Kodeer, 1300 m, 8°19’N, 77°26’E, 8.IV.1997, leg. Sinjaev & Schintlmeister (Coll. MWM / ZSM); 2 ♂, Tamil Nadu, Naduvattam, 22.V.2015, leg. H.S. Datta (Coll. NZCZSI); 1 ♀, Tamil Nadu, Anthiyur, 11.V.2015, leg. H.S. Datta (Coll. NZCZSI); KERALA: 1 ♀, S. India / Kerala, 7 km N Munnar, 1740 m, Kodalar Tea Estate, 10°09’N, 77°04’E, 14–15.IV.1997, leg. Sinjaev & Schintlmeister (Coll. MWM / ZSM); GUJARAT: 1 ♂, Gujarat, Saputara, 29.IX.2005, leg. Navneet Singh (Coll. NZCZSI); 1 ♂, Gujarat, Saputara, 29.XI.2015, leg. H.S. Datta (Coll. NZCZSI); 2 ♂, 1 ♀, Gujarat, Saputara, 30.XI.2015, leg. H.S. Datta (Coll. NZCZSI); 1 ♂, Gujarat, Ahwa, 2.XI.2015, leg. H.S. Datta (Coll. NZC- ZSI); ANDAMAN & NICOBAR ISLANDS: 1 ♂, South Andaman, Havelock, Radhanagar, 14.V.2018, leg. H.S. Datta (Coll. NZCZSI). Diagnosis. Forewing length is 13–14 mm in males and 16–17 mm in females. An unmistakable species differing from other Indian Cyana species by its antemedial line loop-like curved between the cell and the forewing costa. The male genitalia are characterized by the broad vesica bearing a broad, band-like cluster of robust spine-like cornuti. The female genitalia of C. puella are similar to those of C. peregrina, C. catorhoda and C. bhatejai, but differ by the posterior section of corpus bursae being more heavily sclerotized laterally and less rugose medially, and the presence of two rounded signa in the anterior section of corpus bursae (whereas in C. peregrina, C. catorhoda and C. bhatejai the second signum is long, band-like). Distribution. The nominate subspecies is known from India (Himachal Pradesh, Uttarakhand, Haryana, Sikkim, Meghalaya, Madhya Pradesh, Chattisgarh, Maharashtra, Tamil Nadu, Kerala) (Smetacek 2008; Singh et al. 2014), Andaman & Nicobar Islands, Gujarat, Bihar (reported during this study), southeastern Pakistan (present study), Nepal (Kishida 1994) and China (Yunnan) (Fang 2000). The subspecies C. puella postflavida (Rothschild, 1924) is distributed in Sub-Saharan Africa and Arabian Peninsula (Karisch 2013).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.140 | 0.031 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".