Chordeumatida Striariidea, Striarioidea
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Key to families of Chordeumatida in the Pacific Coastal States of the USA 1a. Head partially covered by collum........................................................................ 2 1b. Head not covered by collum............................................................................ 5 2a. Metazonites with strong longitudinal crests extending their full length; pygidium 3-lobed; southern California to British Columbia (also in Idaho and northern Virginia to northern Alabama)....................................... Striariidae 2b. Metazonites without long crests; pygidium not 3-lobed....................................................... 3 3a. Metazonites ornamented with scattered, closely set, short ridges; male ninth legs with 2 telopodite podomeres; northern California to Alaska (also in Idaho, Arizona, Utah, Illinois and Missouri).................................... Tingupidae 3b. Metazonite ornamentation granular, male ninth legs with a single telopodite podomere, or lacking telopodites........... 4 4a. Male ninth legs with a single, enlarged telopodite podomere; San Francisco Bay area to Alaska .......... Rhiscosomididae 4b. Male ninth legs much reduced, lacking telopodites, concealed by gonopods; southern California ............. Apterouridae 5a. Mature males with 26 postcephalic segments; northwestern Washington ........................ Anthroleucosomatidae 5b. Mature males with 28 or 30 postcephalic segments.......................................................... 6 6a. Mature males with 28 postcephalic segments; with ninth legs lacking telopodites, distinctly U-shaped, male tenth legs with enlarged coxosternum; western Washington .................................................... Microlympiidae 6b. Mature males with 28 or 30 (usually 30) postcephalic segments; ninth legs with prominent telopodites of one or two podomeres, tenth legs with coxae and sternum distinct................................................................. 7 7a. Metazonites with neither prominent projecting shoulders nor paranota, metazonital setae short; ninth leg telopodites of mature males with single enlarged podomeres; central California to Alaska ..................................... Caseyidae 7b. Metazonites with prominent projecting shoulders or paranota.................................................. 8 8a. Metazonites sparsely granular, with strong, flattened, rimmed paranota; metazonital setae short; pygidium with 3 lobes; ninth leg telopodites of males with single, swollen, button-like podomere; northwestern Washington ........ Urochordeumatidae 8b. Metazonites smooth, with prominently projecting shoulders sometimes paranota-like but never rimmed; metazonital setae long, curved; pygidium not lobed; ninth leg telopodites of males with two podomeres, the distal one cylindrical and turned dorsally; central California to Alaska (also Rocky Mountains from Alberta to Arizona, Mississippi Valley and Appalachian Mountains from New York to North Carolina).............................................................. Conotylidae
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".