Bibliographic record
Abstract
Genus Neomideopsis Smith, 1983 Neomideopsis Smith, 1983a, pp. 417–420, figs. 1–5. Neomideopsis: Smith, 1990, pp. 249–251, figs. 23–27. Neomideopsis: Smith & Cook, 1991, p. 577. Neomideopsis: Smith et al., 2001, p. 611, fig. 387. Neomideopsis: Smith et al., 2010, p. 553, fig. 15.387. Diagnosis. Larva: Unknown. Adults (modified from Smith 1990): Character states of family Nudomideopsidae. Idiosoma nearly round in shape; convex dorsally. First coxal plate extending nearly to or just beyond anterior edge of shield; suture line between third and fourth coxal plate ending posteriorly on posterior coxal group so that fourth plate does not reach medial edge; fourth coxal plate bearing small projection that partially or completely covers opening for insertion of fourth leg, with suture line at posterior edge distinct. Genital field bearing many (about 23) pairs of acetabula that are free in gonopore in males and embedded in ventral shield in females. Pedipalp tibia relatively elongate, slender and slightly constricted basally; bearing two slender setae ventrally at basal constriction. Type species. Neomideopsis siuslawensis Smith. Species included. Neomideopsis siuslawensis Smith (western North America) (monobasic), but there is an undescribed species from southeastern North America in the Canadian National Collection of Insects and Arachnids. Distribution. North America. Discussion. Smith (1983a, 1990) considered Neomideopsis to be a distinct genus. This treatment was followed by Smith & Cook (1991, 1999) and Smith et al. (2001, 2010) and by us here.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".