MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6950376152 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.5320323

Leucania inermis Unarmed Wainscot

2010· article· en· W6950376152 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBotany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpotsBlack spotWhite (mutation)Line (geometry)Terminal (telecommunication)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

26. Leucania inermis (Forbes) Unarmed Wainscot (Figs. 47–49, Map 27) Identification: Forewing length 14–19 mm. Overall ground color of forewing is light brown with no obvious striping as in L. adjuta. Antemedial line is present, but faint and consists of indistinct black spots, which can be connected with thin lines, especially near posterior margin. Postmedial line consists of a double row of black spots with the distal row consisting of more spots than the proximal row. In some specimens the spots from the proximal row are connected with short lines to the spots in the distal row forming a zig-zag pattern. A black spot is present at end of the discal cell. The orbicular and reniform spots are faint, consisting of just a slightly lighter area in the discal cell; spots sometimes indistinct. Terminal line is a series of minute black spots. Hindwing is gray, lighter basally with no distinct darker margin. Leucania inermis, L. pseudargyria, and L. ursula have a similar forewing pattern. Males of L. inermis can be easily separated from the other two species by the absence of long, thick scales on the foretibia. These long, bushy scales are present on the male foretibia in L. pseudargyria, and L. ursula. The orbicular and reniform spots are very faint to almost absent in L. inermis with the reniform having a minute, central dark dot. Postmedial line consists of a series of 6–8 tiny black dots from costa to posterior margin. Terminal line consists of a series of minute black dots. Hindwing is white with veins highlighted gray and with an indistinct gray marginal band. Flight period: Late April to mid-October, two broods annually (Covell 1984). Collected localities: North Carolina: Haywood Co., Purchase Knob at lower creek; Swain Co., Smokemont, Big Cove Road site p. (3 specimens) Elevation range: 2040–4000 ft. (622–1219 m) General distribution: An eastern species that ranges from Nova Scotia in Canada south to South Carolina. Larval hosts: This is a general grass feeder and larvae obtained from eggs were reared on orchardgrass (Dactylis glomerata L., Poaceae) (Godfrey 1972). MAP 27. Collecting localities of Leucania inermis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.048

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicBotany, Ecology, and Taxonomy StudiesFrench-language works237,207