Bibliographic record
Abstract
Acidogona melanura (Loew) Distribution. The following are new records or indicate the basis for some of the distribution points on map 1 of Foote et al. (1993) or the range listed for this species by Norrbom et al. (1999). The records from Alabama and Oklahoma extended the known distribution of this species considerably westward. Those from Georgia and New York are the first records from those states. The locality in Quebec (the site of Frank McAlpine’s cottage) is north of Ottawa (Jeff Cumming, pers. comm.), not opposite James Bay as indicated on the Foote et al. map, thus this species is not known to occur so far to the north as is indicated on the map. The outlying distribution points for Euaresta bella (Loew) (map 14), Jamesomyia geminata (Loew) (map 31), and Paramyiolia nigricornis (Doane) (map 32) are also based on misplotted dots for this locality. A single very teneral male from Chihuahua (AMNH collection), the only specimen of Acidogona known from northern Mexico, is similar to A. melanura, but its identity remains uncertain. Material examined. CANADA: Quebec: Duncan Lake, nr. Rupert [45°41'N 75°59'W], 1 Aug 1969, J. F. McAlpine, 1♀ (CNC). UNITED STATES: Alabama: Mobile Co., Kushla, 7–19 Oct 1922, A. H. Sturtevant, 1♀ (USNM USNMENT00212920). Georgia: Midway, 14 Jun 1954, D. L. Haynes, 1♀ (USNM USNMENT00212923). New York: Long Island, Cold Spring Harbor, 14 Jul 1927, A. L. Melander, 1♀ (USNM USNMENT00212919). Oklahoma: Latimer Co., [unspecified locality], Jun 1986, K. Stephan, 1♀ (FSCA USNMENT00212922); same, Jun 1987, 1♀ (FSCA USNMENT00212921).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.016 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".