Bibliographic record
Abstract
Paratendipes albimanus (Meigen) Figs 46A–D Diagnosis. Frontoclypeal apotome without suture; labrum as in Fig. 46A; SI setae with bases touching, distally pectinate; pecten epipharyngis with three subequal teeth; antenna (Fig. 46B) 6-segmented with LO alternately placed on apices of segments 2 and 3, AR 1.3–1.4; mandible as in Fig. 46C; mentum (Fig. 46D) with 4 subequal pale median teeth set in a straight row recessed below 1 st lateral which is apressed to larger 2 nd lateral followed by additional 4 laterals in a descending row; VM plates (see Fig. 46D) fan-shaped with coarse striae along anterior margin, surface pollinose. Notes. Although few species are described as larvae, the mentum and VM plates are very distinctive, and are considered diagnostic for species recognition. Ecology and habitat. Larvae of this species are common in headwater streams. A collector-gatherer species with a preference for detritus made of hickory and white oak. This species is univoltine, and emerges from late June to mid July. A second generation has been produced in lab studies using a hickory diet (Ward & Cummins 1978, 1979). Riparian vegetation of study headwater streams consists of Maple, American Beech, Yellow Birch and Red Oak. Sampling sites. Algonquin Provincial Park. Nearctic distribution. Canada: Alberta, Ontario, and Québec, New Brunswick. USA: New York south to South Carolina west to California.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.026 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".