Bibliographic record
Abstract
Key to extant and extinct genera of Siricinae by forewing characters 1. Crossvein cu-a* antefurcal or slightly postfurcal (half or less its length distal to M+Cu)............................ 2 - Crossvein cu-a well postfurcal (more than half its length distal to M+Cu)........................................ 6 2(1). 2r-m lost, 3rm well developed.......................................................................... 3 - 2r-m and 3r-m both present (sometimes both weak or lost)................................................... 5 3(2). 2r-rs distal to 2m-cu, nearer end of long pterostigma........................................ Tremex Jurine, 1807 - 2r-rs placed more basally, near or basal to level of 2m-cu..................................................... 4 4(3). 2r-rs less than its length from pterostigmal end, membrane deeply infuscate basally and along anterior margin.......................................................................................... Afrotremex Pasteels, 1951 - 2r-rs more than its length from pterostigmal end, membrane pale, except darkened in anterior (especially mid-anterior) and apical parts of wing.............................................................. Eriotremex Benson, 1943 5(2). 1-M straight to gently curved........................................................... Xeris A. Costa, 1894 - 1-M strongly bent................................................................ Siricosoma Forsius, 1933 6(1). Cu1* distinct....................................................................... Sirex Linnaeus, 1758 - Cu1 absent or rudimentary............................................................................. 7 7(6). 1r-m long, joins R basal to Rs origin; cell 3rm shorter than high............................. Sirotremex Smith, 1988 - 1r-m short or absent, replaced with Rs+M................................................................. 8 8(7). 2r-m distal to 2m-cu.................................................... Xoanon Semenov-Tian-Shanskij, 1921 - 2r-m basal to 2m-cu.................................................................................. 9 9(8). 2r-m and 3r-m lost (former positions identifiable by slight bends of Rs and M); membrane with distinct transverse corrugation basal to 1-Rs, 1-M, cu-a, longitudinal corrugation distal to this............... Ypresiosirex Archibald & Rasnitsyn, 2016 - 2r-m and 3r-m present; wing membrane not transversally corrugated basally.................................... 10 10(9). 2r-rs distal to 2r-m.................................................................................. 11 - 2r-rs basal to 2r-m.................................................................................. 12 11(10). 1r-rs extremely short, almost its width long; Rs+M distinct although short....................... Teredon Norton, 1869 - 1r-rs distinct even though shorter than 2r-rs; Rs+M extremely short, almost its width long............................................................................................... Eoteredon Archibald, Aase & Nel, 2021 12(10). Length/width 3.2; apex angularly rounded; 1r-rs distinct although shorter than 2r-rs............ Urocerus Geoffroy, 1785 - length/width ca. 3.0; apex broadly rounded; 1r-rs extremely short, almost its width long........... Eourocerus gen. nov.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.054 | 0.024 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".