Scatopsciara (Xenopygina) subfratercula Mohrig & Kauschke, 2016, sp. n.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Scatopsciara (Xenopygina) subfratercula sp. n. (Fig. 9 C–F) Locus typicus: Canada, Alberta, Berland River at Hwy 40, 53.42°N, 118.20°W, pine forest. Holotype: Male, 30.iv.–11.vi.1994, leg. E. Fuller, Malaise trap (PWMP). Description. Male. Head. Brown. Eye bridge 3 facets wide. 4th flagellomere with l/w-index 2.0, haired somewhat shorter than wide. Palpus 3-segmented, short; basal segment without deepened sensory pit, with 1–2 bristles. Thorax. Brown; scutum haired shortly, fine and whitish. Wings pale; R1 rather long, longer 1/2 R; c = 2/3 w; y shorter x, bare; posterior veins distinct, bare. Haltere short, pale. Legs brownish; tibial organ small, with two bristles only; spurs of middle and hind tibiae with long but unequally long spurs; claws toothless. Abdomen. Brownish, haired short, fine, sparsely and whitish. Hypopygium brownish, ventral base closed and haired denser than inner ventral margin of gonocoxites; gonocoxites slightly longer than gonostylus; gonostylus without apical tooth; with 3–4 spines near the apex and 2 closely situated spines on a common strong protuberance in the middle of inner side; all spines with rather strong bases. Tegmen with strong lateral corners. Body size: 2.0 mm. Comments. The species is characterized by a strong protuberance in the middle of the inner side of gonostylus with a pair of closely neighboring spines and 3–4 spines on the apex. The species is similar to Sc. fratercula (Vilkamaa & Hippa). It differs by a larger protuberance in the middle of gonostylus, the base of two spines in the middle of inner side, and a lesser number of spines on the apex. It might be considered as a “missing link” to the species Sc. hastata (Johannsen) and Sc. paradoxa (Frey), which are seen as isolated so far. The species belongs to the Sc. paradoxa group. Distribution. Canada (Alberta).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".