Okanopteryx Archibald & Cannings & Erickson & Bybee & Mathewes 2021, incertae sedis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Okanopteryx incertae sedis Figs. 58–60. Material. Republic: SRUI 99-72-96AB (Fig. 58), collected at Republic B 4131 by Rita Weikel, 27.iv.2019, housed in the Stonerose Interpretive Center collections; SRUI 99-97-44 (Fig. 58), collected at Republic A0307 by Wes Wehr, date unknown, in the Stonerose Interpretive Center collections; F-1046 (Fig. 58), collected at McAbee, collector and date unknown, in the Thompson Rivers University collections; UWBM-72324 (Fig. 60), collected by Wes Wehr at Republic A0307, date unknown, in the Burke Museum collections; SR 13-005-015 AB (Fig. 59), collected at Republic B 4131 by Richard Dillhoff, 6.v.2008, in the Stonerose Interpretive Center collections; GSC 141103 (Fig. 59), collected at the McAbee Hoodoo Face beds, Geological Survey of Canada locality code V-016800, by SBA, July 31 2000, in the Geological Survey of Canada collections; RBCM P1553 (Fig. 60), collected at the McAbee Hoodoo Face beds by John Leahy, date unknown, in the Royal British Columbia Museum collections. Discussion. These wing fragments of varying size appear to belong to one of the defined species of Okanopteryx by their distinctive colouration and all other preserved morphology, but diagnostic character states separating these species are not preserved. For example, F-1046 agrees with the O. macabeensis holotype in all aspects, e.g., just over 14 mm nodus to pterostigma, but lacks almost the entire CuA–A space. The preserved region of specimen SR 13-005-015 AB is almost identical to that of the more complete O. jeppesenorum SR 02-32-23, also from Republic exposure B4131.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.017 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".