MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6950479245 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.7409971

Scrobipalpa truncata, comb. nov.

2022· article· en· W6950479245 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAutopsy Techniques and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsShoreHolotypeSingle specimenTable (database)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Scrobipalpa truncata (Povolný, 2002) comb. nov. Figs 34, 92–94, 141 Euscrobipalpa truncata Povolný 2002: 74. Scrobipalpa abstrusa Huemer & Karsholt, 2010: 113. Syn. nov. Type material examined. Holotype of E. truncata ♂ (gen. slide Hk 5408, D. Povolný, remounted by OB) (MZH). Material examined. 1 ♂, Russia, Altai, Ukok plateau, 2200 m, 18.vi.1995 (Bidzilya) (gen. slide 240/15, OB) (ZMKU); 1 ♀, Russia, Tuva, Kyzyl env., 7.vi.1999 (Lvovsky) (gen. slide 257/19, OB) (ZIN); 1 ♀, Russia, Tuva rep., 50°40’N 92°58’E, 750 m, L. Ubsa-Noor, shore mead./ Nanophyton-steppe, 15.vi.1995 (Jalava & Kullberg) (gen. slide 312/16, OB) (MZH); 1 ♂, Russia, S-Buryatia, 51°11-13’N, 106°10-12’E, 700 m, Hamar-Daban Mts, Murtoi river, Gusinoe Ozero vill. 6 km NW, forest steppe, 27.v.2006 (Nupponen) (gen. slide 258/16, OB); 1 ♂, same data as for preceding (gen. slide 249/16, OB) (Barcode TLMF Lep 28360); 1 ♀, same data as for preceding (gen. slide 241/16, OB) (Barcode TLMF Lep 28314 [failed]); 1 ♂, same data as for preceding (gen. slide 348/16, OB); 1 ♀, same data as for preceding but 26.v.2006 (gen. slide 308/16, OB) (Barcode TLMF Lep 28313); 1 ♂, same data as for preceding (gen. slide 238/ 19♂, OB); 1 ♂, same data as for preceding but 4.vi.2006 (gen. slide 199/16, OB) (Barcode TLMF Lep 28312 [failed]); 1 ♂, Russia, S-Buryatia, 50°58-59’N, 106°38-40’E, 550-600 m, Chikoi valley, Novoselenginsk vill. 10 km S, sand dunes/sand steppe, 1.vi.2006 (gen. slide 250/16, OB); 1 ♂, ditto, but 2.vi.2006 (gen. slide 338/16, OB) (Barcode TLMF Lep 28364) (all NUPP); 1 ♂, Russia, Buryatia Rep., 54°35’N 110°48’E, Barguzin valley, Maisky vill., 500 m, sandy yard, 2–3.vii.1996 (Jalava & Kullberg) (gen. slide 334/16, OB) (MZH); 1 ♂ (paratype of S. abstrusa), Orenburg district, 8 km E Novoiletzk, 9.vi.1998 (Nupponen) (gen. slide 3166, H. Hendriksen) (Barcode TLMF Lep 25594) (ZMUC). 1 ♂, Mongolia, Mongolskiy Altai, 30 km S Biger, mountain steppe, 2600 m, 25.vi.1999 (Ustjuzhanin) (gen. slide 234/15, OB) (ZMKU). 1 ♂, Kyrgyzstan, Tian-Shan occ., Mts, Tshatkal, distr. Ala-Buka, prope Terek-daj, val. fluv. Kasan-Saj, alt. 2000 m, 24–26.v.2003, lum. (Rutjan) (gen. slide 242/19, OB) (ZMKU); 3 ♂, prov. Thschuy, distr. Jalyl, 42.2218°N, 73.6865°E, 2300 m, Suusamyr valley, Kischi-Korumdu, 2.vi.2010 (Pöll) (Barcodes TLMF Lep 21753, TLMF Lep 30541, TLMF Lep 30545) (TLMF). Molecular data. BIN: BOLD:AAW5451. The intraspecific average distance of the barcode region is 0.78% (n=11). The minimum distance to the nearest neighbour, an unidentified species of Scrobipalpa from Canada (BIN: BOLD:AAG9134), is 5.81%. Distribution. Russia: Cheliabinsk, Orenburg and Volgograd regions (Huemer & Karsholt 2010: 114), Altai (new record), Tuva, Buryatia (new record); Kazakhstan (Povolný 2002: 7); Kyrgyzstan (new record); Mongolia (new record). Remarks. Euscrobipalpa truncata was described from a single male collected in the Alma-Ata Nature Reserve, SE Kazakhstan. Scrobipalpa abstrusa was described from a series of both sexes collected in the Amurskii village of the Cheliabinsk district, Russia. Our examination of the remounted “unrolled” slide of the male genitalia of the holotype of S. truncata (Figs 92–94) justifies its conspecificity with the holotype of S. abstrusa and other specimens from Siberia. Hence, the following synonymy is proposed: Scrobipalpa abstrusa Huemer & Karsholt, 2010 syn. nov. of Scrobipalpa truncata (Povolný, 2002).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.832
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0550.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicAutopsy Techniques and OutcomesFrench-language works237,207