MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6950534033 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.6089904

Austrosciara winnertzi Skuse 1888, comb. n.

2016· article· en· W6950534033 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRadiology practices and education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBristleScapeApex (geometry)ScutellumPedicelSeta

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Austrosciara winnertzi (Skuse, 1888) comb. n. (Fig. 8 A‒D) Sciara winnertzi Skuse, 1888 [Skuse (1888): 709 ‒710; Skuse (1890: 407)]. Type locality. Australia, New South Wales, Glenbrook. Lectotype (here designated): Male. Slide bears original label data verbatim ‘ Sc. winnertzi / Ƌ (ink) TYPE./ F. A. A. Skuse’ (print), ‘Glenbrook/ M.’ (ink). Mounted in Canada balsam Dec. 2015. (ANIC; Slide No. 051-1). Paralectotypes. 2 males (not studied). Remarks. Original description states “ Hab.—Glenbrook (Masters). November.” Preservation. Flagellomeres lost, body, legs and hypopygium in good condition, wings deformed. = Sciara rufulenta Edwards, 1927 syn. n. [Tonnoir & Edwards (1927): 794, Figs 173, 174]. Type locality. New Zealand. Holotype: Sciara rufulenta Edwards, 1927, male. Literature: Mohrig & Jaschhof (1999): 22‒26, Fig. 10 a‒f (as Ctenosciara); Menzel & Mohrig (2000): 701 (as Ctenosciara); Wu et al. (2010): 47, Fig. 3 A‒F (as Ctenosciara). Additional description. Male. Head. Eye bridge 3 facets wide; scape and pedicel ochry, flagellomeres lost; palpus 3-segmented. Thorax. Brown, with ochre parts on lateral sides of scutum and katepisternum; dorsocentral bristles and a few lateral bristles strong and dark; scutellum with 4 long marginal bristles; postpronotum bare. Wing pale; R1 rather long; R5 with macrotrichia dorsally along entire length; y nearly = x, with macrotrichia; M-stem weakly visible, with 3‒4 macrotrichia; M-fork long, M-branches and 2/3 of the CuA branches with macrotrichia. Haltere short, brownish. Legs yellowish; apex of fore tibia with a broad comb of hyaline bristles, 2‒3 of them separated (tibial organ); spurs of middle and hind tibia equal in size, longer than width of tibia apex; claws without teeth. Abdomen. With dense and rather long, brownish hairs. Hypopygium ventrally with broad open base, without a lobe or bristle patch; gonocoxites with short and sparse hairs at the inner ventral margin; gonostylus with strong apical tooth and 5‒7 short spines in apical third (among bristle-like hairs); tegmen not visible. Body length: 2.4 mm. Comments. The species is characterized by macrotrichia on all posterior wing veins, an ochry-spotted scutum, yellowish legs with a large comb of hyaline spines (2‒3 isolated) on the apex of fore tibia, an elongated gonostylus with a strong apical tooth and short spines among bristles in the apical third. It is identical to Ct. rufulenta (Edwards) from New Zealand (Mohrig & Jaschhof 1999: 24, fig. 10 a‒f). For a discussion of variability in this species see Mohrig & Jaschhof 1999: 25, fig. 11 a‒i). Distribution. Australia (New South Wales), China, New Zealand.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.039

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicRadiology practices and educationFrench-language works237,207