Bibliographic record
Abstract
Gagea sect. Dschungaricae Levichev This small section with c. 3 species was described in Peterson et al. (2008) to encompass those species having a branched inflorescence with alternate phyllotaxis (for a detailed morphological character data, see Peterson et al. 2008). The only member of this section included in analyses of nrITS and plastid sequences in Peterson et al. (2008), G. dschungarica, is sister to species of G. sect. Stipitatae in our studies. It was placed in G. sect. Monophyllos Pascher subsection Minimae Pascher by Stroh (1937), which is also sister to G. kunawurensis (= G. sect. Stipitatae) in analyses conducted by Zarrei et al. (2009). Pedicel anatomy (type II) is shared by G. dschungarica and G. kunawurensis. However, basal leaf anatomy (type II) in G. dschungarica is similar to that of G. lutea. and G. confusa. Gagea dschungarica has been grouped with G. caroli-kochii and G. bulbifera because of its microreticulate pollen type (Zarrei & Zarre 2005). However, G. dschungarica has morphological characters distinct from G. kunawurensis and related taxa. Thus, establishment of a new section is not appropriate, and it should be placed in a more broadly defined section that includes all members in clade D in Figure 4 of Zarrei et al. (2009).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".