Hadromychus chandleri Bousquet & Leschen 2002
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Hadromychus chandleri Bousquet & Leschen, 2002 NOVA SCOTIA: Colchester Co.: Riversdale, 7.vi.2005, J. Ogden, flight intercept trap, (2), NSNR; Halifax Co.: Antrim, 3.vi.2005, J. Gordon, flight intercept trap, NSNR; Campbell Hill, 2-15.vi.1997, D.J. Bishop, red spruce forest, flight intercept trap, holotype & paratype, (2), CNC; Pictou Co.: Lorne, 1.vi.1995, C. Corkum, flight intercept trap, NSMC; Queens Co.: Butler Rd, 14.vi.2004, P. Colp, flight intercept trap, NSNR. This genus and species were described by Bousquet & Leschen (2002) on the basis of seven specimens originating in New Hampshire, Nova Scotia, Ontario, and Quebec. The holotype (above) is from Nova Scotia. The present account reports five additional specimens of this very rare northeastern North American endomychid (Fig. 4). Bousquet & Leschen (2002) report that one specimen had conidiospores and fungal hyphae in its gut, indicating that it is mycophagous. Apart from that, nothing further is known about its bionomics. Tomaszewska (2005) recently changed the placement of Hadromychus from the Epipocinae to the Danascelinae.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".