New Garden Room, Beauchamps, Wyddial,Hertfordshire: archaeological monitoring report
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In response to a planning condition on the construction of a single storey garden room extension at the rear of Beauchamps, Wyddial, Hertfordshire, the Heritage Network was commissioned by the owners to undertake a programme of archaeological monitoring of the groundworks. The present project has demonstrated that the demolished porch dated to the mid 20th century. A roof beam was encountered, carved with the name L.A. Dowler and the year 1952. It was known, from early 20th century photographs, that an earlier porch had been located on the north elevation of the house. The brick footings for this structure were encountered during the ground reduction phase of the groundworks, showing that it had been slightly larger than its modern replacement. Bricks recovered from the foundation walls indicate that the earlier porch was contemporary with the refronting of the house in the mid 19th century. Evidence was also observed for modern underpinning of the north elevation to the house, between the western foundation to the early porch and the doorway. Ground reduction across the area of the new garden room did not breach the overburden, but the sections for the northern foundation trench demonstrated that the ground level across much of the area of the garden room had already been reduced by approximately 0.50m, presumably when the patio was laid. No other archaeological cut features, deposits or finds were encountered in the course of the project.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".