Bibliographic record
Abstract
Source code of MOIST for theoretical, semi-analytical, long-term field tests. A semi-coupled version of MOIST is also included, which is used for exploring the advantage of fully-coupled version on various spatial and temporal discretization. [Long term validation data can also be download via https://www.pc-progress.com/en/Default.aspx?h1d-lib-isotope]. HOW TO RUN: Each '.rar' has a 'Main_program' or 'Main_program_2' file. It is executable when all the function files are located under the same path. These codes were developed by MATLAB R2022a, thus, we recommend to use R2022a or later, although our tests showed that R2019a also works. A step-by-step explanation on how to run source code can be found from "version 1.0 readme" on the right hand side of this page. OUTPUT VARIABLES There are plenty of output variables after the calculation is done. Following variables could be considered the most important. Each variable is a matrix with N rows and D columns, where N is the soil layers and D is the number of days. z_theta output of soil water content profiles z_cil output of isotope profiles ('Delta_seg1' in semi-coupled version) z_T output of temperature profiles z_h output of soil water head profiles Besides, in the semi-analytical test: zBA results of isotope profiles under non-isotherm and non-saturated conditions zBA1 results of isotope profiles under isotherm and saturated conditions Furthermore, in theoretical tests, pTest is used to select test 1-6. However, it is fixed at 6 in other tests. Note that the some functions are written in C and Matlab, and error may occur if relavent ".dll" files are unable to be found in local mechine. (Please refer to https://www.mathworks.com/help/matlab/matlab_external/invalid-mex-file-error.html) We tested these codes before uploading under the windows platform and everything works well. However, if you found codes cannot run on your end, welcome to report error details on https://github.com/HAN-2/MOIST_ERRORs/issues or send an email to haf033@usask.ca (Han). I will try my best to debug it and thank you for your interest!
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.087 | 0.113 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".