MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6950749218 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.7404814

Platylabus opaculus subsp. americanus Heinrich 1962

2022· article· en· W6950749218 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicTree-ring climate responses
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAllotypeHolotypeNearctic ecozoneSouth carolinaType locality

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Platylabus opaculus americanus Heinrich, 1962 (Figures 26, 27) Platylabus opaculus americanus Heinrich, 1962b: 730 (descr., key, allotype designation); Heinrich 1975: 774 (distr.); Carlson 1979: 545 (cat., distr., notes); Yu and Horstmann 1997: 679 (cat.); Schmidt and Schmidt 2011: 90 (cat.); Yu et al. 2016 (cat.). Original type series Holotype ♀, by original designation (ZSM); allotype 1♂ (CNCI); paratypes: 3♀♀ (ZSM), 3♀♀ (CNCI), 3♀♀ (EMUS). Type locality United States of America, Maine, Alagash. c) Habitus, lateral view. Material examined UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MASSACHUSETTS: Rowley, Essex Country, 30 August 2010, det. R. Carlson, 2♀♀ (BugGuide); NORTH CAROLINA: Mt. Pisgah, elevation 4[000]– 5000 ft., 5 July 1959, leg. H.V. Weems, det. Townes 1967, 1♀ (FSCA). Updated distribution (Figure 27) CANADA: Alberta (Heinrich 1962b); British Columbia (Heinrich 1962b); Québec (Heinrich 1962b); Newfoundland and Labrador (Heinrich 1975); Ontario (Heinrich 1962b); UNITED STATES OF AMERICA: Maine (Heinrich 1962b); Massachusetts (Carlson 2010b) Michigan (Heinrich 1962b); New York (Heinrich 1962b); North Carolina (new state record); Oregon (Heinrich 1962b); Washington (Heinrich 1962b). Host Unknown. Male Described by Heinrich (1962b, p. 730) in the original description, based on a single male that he designated as allotype. The other two known male specimens of the species are from Newfoundland and Labrador, recorded by Heinrich (1975, p. 774). Comments Platylabus opaculus Thomson, 1888, is split in two subspecies, one with European distribution (the nominotypical subspecies), and the other occurring in the Nearctic (Heinrich 1962b, p. 730). According to Heinrich (1962b, p. 730), the only difference between the two is the colour of the legs, which are entirely black in Platylabus opaculus opaculus and rufous in Platylabus opaculus americanus. The records from Massachusetts are from BugGuide and identified by Carlson (2010b) as Platylabus opaculus. However, these have not been recorded in any paper or catalogue (see Yu et al. 2016). The new record for North Carolina is based on a female specimen found at the FSCA that Townes identified as Platylabus opaculus americanus in 1967, which DDP double checked, confirming Townes’ identification. The record has never been reported in any paper or catalogue (cf. Yu et al. 2016), and apparently Heinrich (1975) was not aware of it since no mention of it appears in his paper. The record of Platylabus opaculus americanus for North Carolina also marks the southernmost distributional record for the subspecies and the first for the south-eastern United States (Figure 22b).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.160
Threshold uncertainty score0.318

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicTree-ring climate responsesFrench-language works237,207