Bibliographic record
Abstract
Rosalba strandi (Breuning, 1943) (Fig. 4) Aletretia strandi Breuning, 1943: 38. Remarks: Aletretia strandi was described based on a single specimen from Brazil (Minas Gerais). Currently, this species is known from the Brazilian states Minas Gerais, São Paulo, Paraná and Santa Catarina (Monné 2023; Tavakilian & Chevillotte, 2022; Bezark, 2023). The following variations, not related to geographical distribution, were found in the species: longitudinal pubescent band closer to the sutural pubescent band of the elytra entire (Fig. 4F), reaching the pubescent macula on the posterior quarter, or fragmented anteriorly (Fig. 4J); longitudinal pubescent band on middle of the dorsal surface of the elytra entire (Fig. 4F), reaching the pubescent macula on the posterior quarter, fragmented (Fig. 4J) on the posterior half of the elytra, or almost absent (Fig. 4A) on the posterior quarter of the elytra; outermost longitudinal pubescent band on the elytra entire (Fig. 4E) or interrupted about middle (Fig. 4A, 4C, 4F, 4 H-J). Material examined: PARAGUAY (new country record), Itapúa (Fig. 4 A-4D, 4F-I): Encarnación, Hotel Tirol, beating vegetation, 820 ft. -27.183437 -55.777372, 4 males, 1 female, 24-29.X.2018, L.G. Bezark leg. (3 males, 1 female, LGBC; 1 male, MZSP).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".