MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6950891419 · doi:10.5683/sp3/9y2cyq

Replication Data for: Assessment of lasting pain following castration in 2-week-old calves

2025· dataset· en· W6950891419 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueBorealis · 2025
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicCryospheric studies and observations
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCastrationMeloxicamLyingPain assessmentDronabinolPain scoreAnalysis of variance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Few methods are available to assess pain during healing and none are specific for pain following castration in calves. This study aimed to assess changes in lying behavior and memory as indicators of pain in the days and weeks after castration. Based on previous studies, we predicted that an increase in the number of short-duration lying bouts and incomplete lying bouts (bending front legs but hindquarters remain elevated) can serve as an indicator of evoked pain (i.e., associated with pressure on the wound), and that deficits in reference memory can serve as an indicator of cognitive load associated with lasting pain. Forty 14-day-old male calves (24 Holstein; 16 Holstein x Angus crossbred) were pseudo-randomly assigned to 1 of 4 treatments based upon a 2 x 2 factorial design, considering castration method (band vs. surgical castration), with or without supplementary week-long meloxicam treatment. At castration, all calves were provided multimodal analgesia, including sedation, a local block, and ketoprofen; calves in meloxicam treatment received additional pain medication (meloxicam) every other day during the 1st and 4th weeks following castration, when previous research suggests they experience the most pain. Lying behavior was recorded using accelerometers from 4- to 42-day of age. Calf memory was tested daily using a modified hole-board test in weeks 1 and 4. The day after castration calves in all 4 treatments engaged in more short-duration lying bouts compared to castration day (3.50 ± 0.54 vs. 6.38 ± 0.54), suggesting that the multimodal analgesia provided was insufficient to fully alleviate pain on the day after castration. Band-castrated calves exhibited a greater number of short-duration lying bouts on the day following castration compared to surgically castrated calves (7.64 ± 0.79 vs. 5.13 ± 0.74) indicative of more pain in band-castrated calves at this time. We found limited effects of castration method or additional meloxicam administration on behaviors during the 4th week after castration. We found no effect of castration method or supplemental NSAID on measures of calf memory. Our work provides the first evidence that an increased number of short lying bouts can serve as an indicator of pain in calves during the first days after castration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.019
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: Reproducibility · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.993
Threshold uncertainty score0.096

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.019
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0290.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.083
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
DomainReproducibility
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBorealis→Same topicCryospheric studies and observations→French-language works237,207→