Anderson, John: my Cold War and Gulf War recollections (March 15, 2011)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT: Reason for joining the navy — 0:41 Discussion of his degree /ROTP program — 3:08 Use of his degree in career — 4:01 Early Training — 4:20 Desire to be an Admiral / Early Career Aspirations — 6:06 Operations Officer Experiences / HMCS BONAVENTURE — 7:32 Lack of Interdiction Operations life in the "NATO BOX" — 8:53 Convoy to Europe — 9:25 Focus of CANADA in 1980 — 10:48 Threats in 1980 — 11:00 Strategic Missile Capability — 11:40 Anti-Air Warfare — 12:13 ASW AirCraft Carrier — 13:00 Air Defence in Canada as primarily self defence — 13:29 Need for Area Air Defence, introduction of Iroquois Class — 13:46 1980 Mid Life Update Focus — 14:15 Future of the Navy & 280s — 14:30 Russian Surface Combatants & Bonaventure Air Assets — 15:00 Air Defence Problem, Anti-Ship missile — 16:05 Introduction of 280s — 16:30 Coalition Exercises — 18:10 Director of Maritime Requirements Sea — 19:54 Acquisitions at DMRS (CPF, Tropic Class, Sea King Replacement) — 21:58 Defence Research Program — 23:13 Themes from cold war to today — 23:13 Requirements for other less conventional strategies — 27:44 Boarding Party Operations — 28:35 NATO Role in ASW development — 29:55 Using NATO to justify acquisitions — 31:36 NATO and the cyclic relationship — 33:06 Director Maritime Doctrine and Ops — 34:33 Role in Operation Friction — 36:58 Added Weapons — 42:33 Task Group Reasoning — 44:56 Strongpoint of NATO — 45:19 Task Group Reasoning ?? 45:43 Acceptance of Recommendation by Government — 46:15 Role Once Operation Friction Was in Motion — 46:48 Turning Point in Command — 48:17 Tactics and Strategy Preparation — 49:44 No Doctrine, but general doctrine and inherent flexibility — 50:28 Naval co-operation in staff work — 52:15 Public Perception of Navy in 1980 — 53:05 Perception during Op Friction — 53:47 Command Structure Change — 55:10 Command Was Clear — 56:39 His structure, HQ Structure was static — 57:39 Admiral George's Comments on Operation Friction — 57:55 Athabaskan Trump Conversion — 58:34 Communication — 59:19 Dusty Miller's Selection — 1:00:35 Capable AOR — 1:10:10 Communications through Maritime Requirements — 1:02:08 Communications not NATO, but Canada — 1:03:22 Operation Friction Affect on the Future — 1:03:43 CDS Atmosphere — 1:05:56
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.008 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.081 | 0.048 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".