MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6957604113 · doi:10.6068/dp150396d39ce12

Trend 1990 - 2008. United Nations Economic Commission for Europe. Macroeconomic Statistics [Archive]: GDP: Expenditure Approach, in National Currency | Country: Italy | Selection 1: GDP | Selection 2: Millions of NCUs at average prices of 2005, 1990-2008. Data-Planet™ Statistical Ready Reference by Conquest Systems, Inc. Dataset-ID: 054-001-004.

2015· other· en· W6957604113 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueData Planet · 2015
Typeother
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLinguistics and Language Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNational accountsCommissionCurrencyOfficial statisticsEconomic statisticsGross fixed capital formationMeasures of national income and outputInternational Standard Industrial ClassificationDescriptive statistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (2015). Macroeconomic Statistics [Archive]: GDP: Expenditure Approach, in National Currency | Country: Italy | Selection 1: GDP | Selection 2: Millions of NCUs at average prices of 2005, 1990-2008. Data-Planet™ Statistical Ready Reference by Conquest Systems, Inc. [Data-file]. Dataset-ID: 054-001-004. Dataset: Shows GDP in national currencies, measured by expenditures for goods and services, with detail for capital formation and changes in inventories. The Macroeconomic Statistics database presents a structured set of economic indicators for the 56 member states of the United National Economic Commission on Europe (UNECE) region, which include the countries of Europe, but also Canada, the United States, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, and Israel. The data are compiled by the Statistical Division of the UNECE Secretariat from different official national and international sources. Data available varies by country. NOTE: Data-Planet discontinued updating of this dataset in 2011 due to irregularities in the data structure. For more recent data on similar topics, please see the Eurostat database. Data on GDP by expenditure are in the standard Commission of European Communities-Eurostat 1993 System of National Accounts classification of transactions in goods and services. Constant price estimates are based on data compiled by the National Statistical Offices (NSOs). To facilitate international comparisons, the data reported by the NSOs have been scaled to the current price value of 2005. As mentioned above, since early 2006, most UNECE countries moved to chain-linking to measure their national accounts aggregates in volume terms. Users who work with chained levels must be aware that chain-linking results in the loss of additivity of volume series for all years except for the reference year and the year following it. Non-additivity arises for purely mathematical reasons; the discrepancies should not be interpreted as indications of loss of quality. Category: Industry, Business, and Commerce, International Relations and Trade Source: United Nations Economic Commission for Europe The United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE) was established in 1947 as one of the five regional economic commissions of the United Nations. Its major aim is to promote pan-European economic integration. To do so, UNECE brings together 56 countries located in the European Union, non-EU Western and Eastern Europe, South-East Europe and Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) and North America. All these countries dialogue and cooperate under the aegis of the UNECE on economic and sectoral issues. http://www.unece.org/ Subject: Gross Domestic Product (GDP)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.107
Threshold uncertainty score0.225

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.019
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0670.087

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueData PlanetSame topicLinguistics and Language AnalysisFrench-language works237,207