Bis{N′-[3-(4-nitrophenyl)-1-phenylprop-2-en-1-ylidene]-N-phenylcarbamimidothioato}zinc(II): crystal structure, Hirshfeld surface analysis and computational study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The title zinc bis(thiosemicarbazone) complex, [Zn(C 22 H 17 N 4 O 2 S) 2 ], comprises two N , S -donor anions, leading to a distorted tetrahedral N 2 S 2 donor set. The resultant five-membered chelate rings are nearly planar and form a dihedral angle of 73.28 (3)°. The configurations about the endocyclic- and exocyclic-imine bonds are Z and E , respectively, and that about the ethylene bond is E . The major differences in the conformations of the ligands are seen in the dihedral angles between the chelate ring and nitrobenzene rings [40.48 (6) cf . 13.18 (4)°] and the N -bound phenyl and nitrobenzene ring [43.23 (8) and 22.64 (4)°]. In the crystal, a linear supramolecular chain along the b -axis direction features amine-N—H...O(nitro) hydrogen bonding. The chains assemble along the 2 1 -screw axis through a combination of phenyl-C—H...O(nitro) and π(chelate ring)–π(phenyl) contacts. The double chains are linked into a three-dimensional architecture through phenyl-C—H...O(nitro) and nitro-O...π(phenyl) interactions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".