MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Additional file 4 of PGRMC1 effects on metabolism, genomic mutation and CpG methylation imply crucial roles in animal biology and disease

2020· article· en· W6958215089 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueFigshare · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicWorking Capital and Financial Performance
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCpG siteSmall hairpin RNADNA methylationMethylationMutationPyrosequencingGenomicsCell

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Additional file 4 Fig. S4. PGRMC1 phosphorylation status affects the NNMT pathway. Related to Fig. 6. (A) Metabolomics quantification of S-adenosyl-Methionine (SAM) levels for the indicated cell lines, representing n = 12 (four technical replicates for each of three independent cell lines per PGRMC1 condition). (B) RT-PCR quantification of NNMT mRNA levels after treatment by an NNMT-specific shRNA (NN) or a random scramble shRNA control (scr) in TM cells stably expressing lentiplasmid-driven shRNAs. RT-PCR Methods follow A. p < 0.003 (2-tailed T test). Methods follow Fig. 6b. (C) 1-MNA ion intensities in cells from B, determined following methods from Fig. 6a, using two technical replicates of each of three biological replicates per cell condition (n = 6). Labels follow B. The result was significantly different by T-test (p < 0.001) after removal of one Scr outlier (panel displayed) or by Mann-Whitney U test (p < 0.002) including the outlier. (D) SAM ion intensities in the cells from B were not significantly different (T-test). Labels follow B. (E) 1-MNA attenuates rounded morphology in DM cells. Results for n = 5 for each 1-MNA concentration are shown in the boxplot. 0.5 mM 1-MNA was significantly different (p < 0.0001, ANOVA, post hoc Tukey HSD) to all other treatments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.019
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.894
Threshold uncertainty score0.151

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.019
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.8940.219

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFigshareSame topicWorking Capital and Financial PerformanceFrench-language works237,207