MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Additional file 1 of Naïve Huntington’s disease microglia mount a normal response to inflammatory stimuli but display a partially impaired development of innate immune tolerance that can be counteracted by ganglioside GM1

2024· article· en· W6958446500 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueFigshare · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicGenetic Neurodegenerative Diseases
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicrogliaPropidium iodideFlow cytometryTLR2Immune systemTLR4Innate immune systemCell

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Additional file 1: Fig. S1. Q7/7 and Q140/140 microglia express similar levels of TLR4 and TLR2 at the plasma membrane in naïve and stimulated conditions. (A) Schematic representation and timeline of cell treatment with LPS. Representative histograms and relative flow cytometry quantification (% TLR4+-cells and median fluorescence intensity) of plasma membrane TLR4 in naïve microglia (I), after 12 h of exposure to LPS (100 ng/ml) (II), and after LPS removal and 24 h of recovery in serum-free medium (III). N ≥ 5. A two-sided unpaired t-test was used to compare TLR4 levels between genotypes. (B) Plasma membrane TLR2 was measured by flow cytometry in naïve microglia (I) and after 6 h of LTA (10 ug/ml) stimulation (II). Representative histograms and quantification of TLR2+-cells and TLR2 median fluorescence intensity are shown in the bar graphs. N ≥ 3. Two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. Bars are means ± STDEV. Fig. S2. LPS treatment does not significantly affect the survival of Q7/7 and Q140/140 microglia. Representative images of Q140/140 microglia stained with Hoechst (blue) and PI (yellow) after incubation in serum-free medium for 24 h (top panels), and Metaxpress software masks (bottom panels) used for the automated quantification of cell nuclei and propidium iodide (PI)-positive cells (dead cells) by high-content microscopy analysis of cell death. Scale bar = 150 μm. The graph shows the % of PI-positive cells in microglia cultures treated with or without LPS (100 ng/ml) for 24 and 48 h. N = 4. Two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post test. Fig. S3. Necrotic N2a cells carrying mutant HTT induce higher microglial expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines compared to necrotic cells carrying wild-type HTT. Q7/7 and Q140/140 microglia were incubated with necrotic N2a25Q (25Q, wild-type HTT) or N2a97Q (97Q, mutant HTT) cells for 4 h (1:2 microglia to necrotic cells ratio). Graphs show the fold-change of pro-inflammatory cytokine gene expression compared to the expression induced by necrotic N2a25Q cells. mRNA levels of the indicated cytokines were normalized over the geometric mean of three housekeeping genes (Normalization Index) (N ≥ 4). Ratio paired t-test. *p < 0.05. Fig. S4. Comparable levels of cell death in Q7/7 and Q140/140 microglia after exposure to LPS and recovery. LDH enzymatic activity released in the culture medium due to cell death was measured in microglia cultures incubated with or without LPS (100 ng/ml) for 12 h (A) and after 24 h recovery in serum-free medium. N = 3. (B) Two-way ANOVA with Tukey's multiple comparisons test. Bars are means ± STDEV. *p < 0.05. Fig. S5 . GM1 decreases expression and production of pro-inflammatory cytokines in Q7/7 microglia. Q7/7 microglia were activated with LPS (100 ng/ml) for 3 h, washed and treated with GM1 (50 µM) for 6 h. GM1 reduced the levels of (A) Il-1b and Tnf mRNA (N = 5), and (B) TNF secreted in the medium (N ≥ 3). Gene expression was normalized over Ppia. Two-way ANOVA with Tukey's multiple comparisons test was used. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001. Fig. S6. GM1 does not affect Irak-3 expression in naïve Q7/7 and Q14/140 microglia. Naïve microglia were incubated with GM1 in serum-free medium for 8 h prior to RNA extraction and analysis of Irak-3 mRNA levels. Irak-3 expression was normalized over the geometric mean of three housekeeping genes. No statistically significant differences were detected among groups. N ≥ 3. Bars are means ± STDEV. Two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.019
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.896
Threshold uncertainty score0.148

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.019
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.8960.184

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFigshare→Same topicGenetic Neurodegenerative Diseases→French-language works237,207→