The Division Of A Patrimony - A Case Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
From the time the New Conquests became a part of the Estado de India, the Portuguese government moved slowly but surely to clip the wings of the desāis and sardesāis. Under the preceding regimes, they were exempted from paying land revenue tax to the monarch on the properties owned by them. By the ‘portaria’ (order) of 12th January 1841, the Portuguese government abolished this exemption; and decreed that all ‘sar-dessais, dessais e outras familias nobres’ (sardesāis, desāis and other noble families) irrespective of the ‘jerarchia, classe ou condição alguma’ (hierarchy, class or any other attribute) shall have to pay the property taxes. [Xavier, 1840 : Collecção De Bandos e Outras Differentes Providencias…, Vol. I, 207]<br>But the harshest of all was the enacting of the provisions of the Codigo Dos Usos E Costumes dos Habitantes Das Novas Conquistas, which was the de facto Civil Code for the inhabitants of the New Conquests. What really undermined the interests of the desāis and sardesāis were the provisions governing the ‘succession, inheritance and division of the property’; these could be compared to Lord Dalhousie’s Doctrine of Lapse. Under these provisions, whenever an ‘administrador’ (head of a sub-family) died without a legitimate son, the entire sub-family lost its hakka. This went against the practice of the desāis and sardesāis to adopt a boy from within the extended family to perpetuate the family and its hakka. <br>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".